Re: [Security, resend] Instant crash with rtl8169 and large packets
From: Eric Dumazet <hidden>
Date: 2009-06-08 15:07:01
Also in:
lkml
Subsystem:
networking drivers, the rest · Maintainers:
Andrew Lunn, "David S. Miller", Eric Dumazet, Jakub Kicinski, Paolo Abeni, Linus Torvalds
Michael Tokarev a écrit :
Thank you Eric for the reply. Eric Dumazet wrote:quoted
Michael Tokarev a écrit :[]quoted
quoted
The situation is very simple: with an RTL8169 (probably onboard) GigE card which, by default, is configured to have MTU (maximal transmission unit) to be 1500 bytes, it's *trivial* to instantly crash the machine by sending it a *single* packet of size >1500 bytes (provided the network switch can handle jumbo frames).[]quoted
quoted
I suppose you use a recent kernel ?http://marc.info/?t=123462473200002 -- here's my first attempt, at Feb this year. It was 2.6.27 or so. Right now I'm running 2.6.29[.4]. So I think yes, I use a recent kernel.quoted
Could you please try following patch ?[]quoted
diff --git a/drivers/net/r8169.c b/drivers/net/r8169.c index e94316b..c08b97a 100644 --- a/drivers/net/r8169.c +++ b/drivers/net/r8169.c@@ -3468,7 +3468,7 @@ static int rtl8169_rx_interrupt(structnet_device *dev, if (status & DescOwn) break; - if (unlikely(status & RxRES)) { + if (unlikely(status & (RxRES | RxRWT | RxRUNT | RxCRC | RxFOVF))) { if (netif_msg_rx_err(tp)) { printk(KERN_INFO "%s: Rx ERROR. status = %08x\n",Tried that one, got no printk (at least not a visible one) and exactly the same OOPS as before. Trivial test with ping -c1 -s3000 $my_ip_addr (learned to add -c1 because the previous time my machine crashed several times in a row till I figured out what's going on and unplugged the ethernet cord -- even if ping were running from an xterm executed from the machine to which I were pinging to! :) Also got ext4fs corruption when rebooted (it's a staging area so nothing important is there but still.. "interesting"). Also tried 32bit kernel (were using 64bits -- exactly the same result). I wish I had a serial cable or even a serial port on this machine.... But I guess it'd not help anyway, because the machine locks hard. Thanks! /mjt
OK, 2nd try then :) Thanks
diff --git a/drivers/net/r8169.c b/drivers/net/r8169.c
index e94316b..9080b08 100644
--- a/drivers/net/r8169.c
+++ b/drivers/net/r8169.c@@ -3495,7 +3495,8 @@ static int rtl8169_rx_interrupt(struct net_device *dev, * frames. They are seen as a symptom of over-mtu * sized frames. */ - if (unlikely(rtl8169_fragmented_frame(status))) { + if (unlikely(rtl8169_fragmented_frame(status) || + (unsigned int)pkt_size > tp->rx_buf_sz)) { dev->stats.rx_dropped++; dev->stats.rx_length_errors++; rtl8169_mark_to_asic(desc, tp->rx_buf_sz);