Thread (16 messages) 16 messages, 3 authors, 2009-06-04

Re: [resend] Passive OS fingerprint xtables match.

From: Patrick McHardy <hidden>
Date: 2009-06-04 13:16:18
Also in: netfilter-devel

Evgeniy Polyakov wrote:
On Thu, Jun 04, 2009 at 02:11:24PM +0200, Patrick McHardy (kaber@trash.net) wrote:
quoted
Thats not what I meant. struct xt_match_param is passed to the
->match() callbacks from *t_do_table(). This is where you can
add the real hook number to have it available in ->match().

(Forgot to mention earlier: please in a seperate patch and adjusting
 all *tables copies)
Kind of this (for ipv4 only so far, also reorderd a field to fill the
gap):
Exactly. But please verify that by reordering, you're not moving
the more commonly used members out of the first cacheline.
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help