Le mardi 02 juin 2009 à 13:50 +0200, Pascal Terjan a écrit :

Le samedi 30 mai 2009 à 00:30 +0200, Francois Romieu a écrit :

quoted

Pascal Terjan [off-list ref] :
[...]

quoted

Oh and even
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10694

Yes, it sucks.

quoted

Should I add some info there ?

Not yet but could you retry with RX_BUF_SIZE set to 1544,
1528 and 1520 ?

1544, 1528 and 1520 fail the same way

By the way there is some strange code:

tp->rx_buf_sz = (mtu > RX_BUF_SIZE) ? mtu + ETH_HLEN + 8 : RX_BUF_SIZE;

Isn't there a (different from the one I'm interested in :) ) bug when
1500 < mtu <= RX_BUF_SIZE

Shouldn't the test be (mtu > ETH_DATA_LEN) ?