On Sun, May 31, 2009 at 07:40:16PM -0400, jamal wrote:

On Sun, 2009-05-31 at 21:55 +0200, Jarek Poplawski wrote:

quoted

But then, there could be "tc filter replace" with only this
(n->nlmsg_type == RTM_NEWTFILTER && (n->nlmsg_flags&(NLM_F_CREATE)))
which can't get here with a newly created tp, I guess.

Right - because in that case tp would already exist and would
be found in the lookup.

But how about that (of course extremely rude) case "tc filter replace"
is run with a new prio?

Thanks,
Jarek P.