On Fri, 1 May 2009, Eric Dumazet wrote:

Hugh Dickins a écrit :

quoted

On Thu, 30 Apr 2009, Mel Gorman wrote:

quoted

On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 10:09:48PM +0100, Hugh Dickins wrote:

quoted

On an x86_64 with 4GB ram, tcp_init()'s call to alloc_large_system_hash(),
to allocate tcp_hashinfo.ehash, is now triggering an mmotm WARN_ON_ONCE on
order >= MAX_ORDER - it's hoping for order 11.  alloc_large_system_hash()
had better make its own check on the order.

Well, I dont know why, since alloc_large_system_hash() already take
care of retries, halving size between each tries.

Sorry, I wasn't clear: I just meant that if we keep that
WARN_ON_ONCE(order >= MAX_ORDER) in __alloc_pages_slowpath(),
then we need alloc_large_system_hash() to avoid the call to
__get_free_pages() in the order >= MAX_ORDER case,
precisely because we're happy with the way it halves and
falls back, so don't want a noisy warning; and now that we know
that it could give that warning, it would be a shame for the
_ONCE to suppress more interesting warnings later.

I certainly did not mean for alloc_large_system_hash() to fail
in the order >= MAX_ORDER case, nor did the patch do so.

Hugh