Re: [PATCH] bonding: allow bond in mode balance-alb to work properly in bridge -try4
From: Patrick McHardy <hidden>
Date: 2009-03-27 08:56:12
Also in:
bridge, lkml
From: Patrick McHardy <hidden>
Date: 2009-03-27 08:56:12
Also in:
bridge, lkml
Jiri Pirko wrote:
Fri, Mar 27, 2009 at 08:53:13AM CET, kaber@trash.net wrote:quoted
quoted
Me neither, but I don't think this approach can be done without the hook. While I still find it questionable whether this mode really needs to be supported for a bridge at allWell there is I think nothing unusual in this net scheme. And by for example the increasing setups with kvm/bridging it will be needed more and more.
Mangling ARP packets for load-balancing purposes seems quite unusual.
quoted
, an alternative approach would be to have bonding add FDB entries for all secondary MACs to make bridging treat them as local.Yes - that is the clear way. But there's not really straihtforward way to do this. The clear approach would be to extend struct net_device for list of these mac addresses and let the drivers (binding) fill it and bridge to process it. But I don't know.
We have a list of secondary unicast addresses, but that might not be suitable in this case since the addresses are (mostly) intended not to be visible to the stack if I understood correctly.