Thread (106 messages) 106 messages, 11 authors, 2009-05-29

Re: [PATCH] bonding: allow bond in mode balance-alb to work properly in bridge -try4

From: Patrick McHardy <hidden>
Date: 2009-03-27 08:56:12
Also in: bridge, lkml

Jiri Pirko wrote:
Fri, Mar 27, 2009 at 08:53:13AM CET, kaber@trash.net wrote:
quoted
quoted
Me neither, but I don't think this approach can be done without the
hook. While I still find it questionable whether this mode really
needs to be supported for a bridge at all
Well there is I think nothing unusual in this net scheme. And by for example
the increasing setups with kvm/bridging it will be needed more and more.
Mangling ARP packets for load-balancing purposes seems quite unusual.
quoted
, an alternative approach
would be to have bonding add FDB entries for all secondary MACs to
make bridging treat them as local.
Yes - that is the clear way. But there's not really straihtforward way to do
this. The clear approach would be to extend struct net_device for list of these
mac addresses and let the drivers (binding) fill it and bridge to process it.
But I don't know.
We have a list of secondary unicast addresses, but that might not
be suitable in this case since the addresses are (mostly) intended
not to be visible to the stack if I understood correctly.
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help