From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2009 15:32:20 -0800 (PST)
On Thu, 5 Feb 2009, David Miller wrote:
quoted
Herbert, please help Jeff try to track down the cause of this.
If we can't figure it out soon I'll have to revert.
Why is there even any discussion?
URG is broken as a concept, no sane/modern use case exists. It's totally
uninteresting _except_ as a "legacy binary" issue, so
- there's no point in trying to "improve" it.
- even just a whiff of "breaks legacy app" just says "revert it".
No?
Sure, and we can put the change back in if we ever figure out what the
problem was.
This change is in 2.6.28 too, so I'll revert and queue the revert up
for -stable as well.