Re: 2.6.29-rc3: tg3 dead after resume
From: Rafael J. Wysocki <hidden>
Date: 2009-01-31 00:35:45
Also in:
lkml
On Saturday 31 January 2009, Linus Torvalds wrote:
On Sat, 31 Jan 2009, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:quoted
I wonder if this change makes any difference:--- linux-2.6.orig/drivers/pci/pci-driver.c +++ linux-2.6/drivers/pci/pci-driver.c@@ -501,6 +501,9 @@ static int pci_pm_suspend(struct device if (pci_has_legacy_pm_support(pci_dev)) return pci_legacy_suspend(dev, PMSG_SUSPEND); + if (!drv || !drv->pm) + return 0; + if (drv && drv->pm && drv->pm->suspend) { error = drv->pm->suspend(dev); suspend_report_result(drv->pm->suspend, error);I don't think that's right. Now you don't end up calling pci_pm_default_suspend_generic() at all, and this no pci_save_state(). But I think it could easily be the call to pci_disable_enabled_device(). It does that if (atomic_read(&dev->enable_cnt)) do_pci_disable_device(dev); and that ends up disabling PCI_COMMAND_MASTER and then calling pcibios_disable_device().
pci_disable_enabled_device() is not called for the PCIe port driver, because it has the legacy PM support. What happens is pci_pm_suspend(port) -> pci_legacy_suspend(port) -> pcie_portdrv_suspend(port) [this doesn't save the state] pci_save_state(port) and then, with interrupts off pci_pm_suspend_noirq(port) -> pci_legacy_suspend_late(port) -> pcie_portdrv_suspend_late(port) -> pci_save_state(port) and I suspect this last pci_save_state() breaks things. I'm not sure why, though. Thanks, Rafael