hardware time stamping with optional structs in data area · Patrick Ohly <hidden> · 2008-12-15
[RFC PATCH 01/12] net: new user space API for time stamping of incoming and outgoing packets · Patrick Ohly <hidden> · 2008-12-15
[RFC PATCH 02/12] net: infrastructure for hardware time stamping · Patrick Ohly <hidden> · 2008-12-15
[RFC PATCH 03/12] net: socket infrastructure for SO_TIMESTAMPING · Patrick Ohly <hidden> · 2008-12-15
[RFC PATCH 04/12] sockets: allow allocating skb with optional structures · Patrick Ohly <hidden> · 2008-12-15
[RFC PATCH 05/12] ip: support for TX timestamps on UDP and RAW sockets · Patrick Ohly <hidden> · 2008-12-15
[RFC PATCH 06/12] debug: NULL pointer check in ip_output · Patrick Ohly <hidden> · 2008-12-15
[RFC PATCH 07/12] net: pass new SIOCSHWTSTAMP through to device drivers · Patrick Ohly <hidden> · 2008-12-15
[RFC PATCH 08/12] igb: stub support for SIOCSHWTSTAMP · Patrick Ohly <hidden> · 2008-12-15
[RFC PATCH 09/12] clocksource: allow usage independent of timekeeping.c · Patrick Ohly <hidden> · 2008-12-15
[RFC PATCH 10/12] igb: access to NIC time · Patrick Ohly <hidden> · 2008-12-15
[RFC PATCH 11/12] time sync: generic infrastructure to map between time stamps generated by a time counter and system time · Patrick Ohly <hidden> · 2008-12-15
[RFC PATCH 12/12] igb: use clocksync to implement hardware time stamping · Patrick Ohly <hidden> · 2008-12-15
Re: [RFC PATCH 09/12] clocksource: allow usage independent of timekeeping.c · John Stultz <hidden> · 2008-12-15
Re: [RFC PATCH 09/12] clocksource: allow usage independent of timekeeping.c · Patrick Ohly <hidden> · 2008-12-15
Re: [RFC PATCH 09/12] clocksource: allow usage independent of timekeeping.c · Daniel Walker <hidden> · 2009-02-04
Re: [RFC PATCH 09/12] clocksource: allow usage independent of timekeeping.c · Patrick Ohly <hidden> · 2009-02-04
Re: [RFC PATCH 02/12] net: infrastructure for hardware time stamping · Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au> · 2008-12-15
Re: [RFC PATCH 02/12] net: infrastructure for hardware time stamping · Patrick Ohly <hidden> · 2008-12-16
Re: hardware time stamping with optional structs in data area · Patrick Ohly <hidden> · 2009-01-16
Re: hardware time stamping with optional structs in data area · David Miller <davem@davemloft.net> · 2009-01-16
Re: hardware time stamping with optional structs in data area · Patrick Ohly <hidden> · 2009-01-21
[PATCH NET-NEXT 01/12] net: new user space API for time stamping of incoming and outgoing packets · Patrick Ohly <hidden> · 2009-01-21
[PATCH NET-NEXT 02/12] net: infrastructure for hardware time stamping · Patrick Ohly <hidden> · 2009-01-21
[PATCH NET-NEXT 03/12] net: socket infrastructure for SO_TIMESTAMPING · Patrick Ohly <hidden> · 2009-01-21
[PATCH NET-NEXT 04/12] sockets: allow allocating skb with optional structures · Patrick Ohly <hidden> · 2009-01-21
[PATCH NET-NEXT 05/12] ip: support for TX timestamps on UDP and RAW sockets · Patrick Ohly <hidden> · 2009-01-21
[PATCH NET-NEXT 06/12] debug: NULL pointer check in ip_output · Patrick Ohly <hidden> · 2009-01-21
[PATCH NET-NEXT 07/12] net: pass new SIOCSHWTSTAMP through to device drivers · Patrick Ohly <hidden> · 2009-01-21
[PATCH NET-NEXT 08/12] igb: stub support for SIOCSHWTSTAMP · Patrick Ohly <hidden> · 2009-01-21
[PATCH NET-NEXT 09/12] clocksource: allow usage independent of timekeeping.c · Patrick Ohly <hidden> · 2009-01-21
[PATCH NET-NEXT 10/12] igb: access to NIC time · Patrick Ohly <hidden> · 2009-01-21
[PATCH NET-NEXT 11/12] time sync: generic infrastructure to map between time stamps generated by a time counter and system time · Patrick Ohly <hidden> · 2009-01-21
[PATCH NET-NEXT 12/12] igb: use clocksync to implement hardware time stamping · Patrick Ohly <hidden> · 2009-01-21
Re: [PATCH NET-NEXT 11/12] time sync: generic infrastructure to map between time stamps generated by a time counter and system time · Ingo Molnar <hidden> · 2009-01-21
Re: [PATCH NET-NEXT 11/12] time sync: generic infrastructure to map between time stamps generated by a time counter and system time · Patrick Ohly <hidden> · 2009-01-21
Re: hardware time stamping with optional structs in data area · David Miller <davem@davemloft.net> · 2009-01-26
Re: hardware time stamping with optional structs in data area · Patrick Ohly <hidden> · 2009-01-26
Re: hardware time stamping with optional structs in data area · David Miller <davem@davemloft.net> · 2009-01-27
Re: hardware time stamping with optional structs in data area · Patrick Ohly <hidden> · 2009-01-27
Re: hardware time stamping with optional structs in data area · Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au> · 2009-01-28
Re: hardware time stamping with optional structs in data area · Patrick Ohly <hidden> · 2009-01-28
Re: hardware time stamping with optional structs in data area · Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au> · 2009-01-28
Re: hardware time stamping with optional structs in data area · David Miller <davem@davemloft.net> · 2009-02-01
Re: hardware time stamping with optional structs in data area · Patrick Ohly <hidden> · 2009-02-04

Re: hardware time stamping with optional structs in data area

From: David Miller <hidden>
Date: 2009-01-16 19:00:45
Also in: linux-api, lkml

From: Patrick Ohly <redacted>
Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2009 11:36:04 +0100

David, do you think it is ready to get included?

Resubmit the patch set before asking such questions.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-api" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

`h`	back out one level
`j`	next message in thread
`k`	previous message in thread
`l`	drill in
`Esc`	close help / fold thread tree
`?`	toggle this help