Re: [PATCH 01/11] sfc: SFT9001: Enable robust link training
From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Date: 2009-01-31 00:02:29
From: Ben Hutchings <redacted> Date: Sat, 31 Jan 2009 00:04:15 +0000
On Fri, 2009-01-30 at 14:09 -0800, David Miller wrote:quoted
From: Ben Hutchings <redacted> Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2009 03:48:10 +0000quoted
From: Steve Hodgson <redacted> Enable a firmware option that appears to be necessary for reliable operation. Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <redacted>I applied all of these patches but: 1) When you get changes written by other people, such as Steve Hodgson here and in the next few patches, you need to get Signed-off-by lines from them too.I have been attributing changes to my colleagues for some time and never heard this. In any case the copyright lies with my employer and I am authorised to release these changes; isn't that what my initial sign- off means?
Sure, but it is even more meaningful if the person who actually wrote the changes signs off on it too.
quoted
2) Outside of the merge window I do not want to see totally irrelevant stuff like PHY loopback fixes. Those kinds of fixes are totally inappropriate at this time.Are you saying that a spurious self-test failure is not a serious bug?
Normal users will not run the self-test giblet, and it has not been reported as a 2.6.29 regression on lkml.