Thread (40 messages) 40 messages, 2 authors, 2009-01-31

Re: [PATCH 01/11] sfc: SFT9001: Enable robust link training

From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Date: 2009-01-31 00:02:29

From: Ben Hutchings <redacted>
Date: Sat, 31 Jan 2009 00:04:15 +0000
On Fri, 2009-01-30 at 14:09 -0800, David Miller wrote:
quoted
From: Ben Hutchings <redacted>
Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2009 03:48:10 +0000
quoted
From: Steve Hodgson <redacted>

Enable a firmware option that appears to be necessary for reliable
operation.

Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <redacted>
I applied all of these patches but:

1) When you get changes written by other people, such as
   Steve Hodgson here and in the next few patches, you need
   to get Signed-off-by lines from them too.
I have been attributing changes to my colleagues for some time and never
heard this.  In any case the copyright lies with my employer and I am
authorised to release these changes; isn't that what my initial sign-
off means?
Sure, but it is even more meaningful if the person who actually
wrote the changes signs off on it too.
quoted
2) Outside of the merge window I do not want to see totally
   irrelevant stuff like PHY loopback fixes.

   Those kinds of fixes are totally inappropriate at this time.
Are you saying that a spurious self-test failure is not a serious bug?
Normal users will not run the self-test giblet, and it has
not been reported as a 2.6.29 regression on lkml.
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help