Thread (16 messages) 16 messages, 7 authors, 2009-04-21

Re: [ofa-general] NetEffect, iw_nes and kernel warning

From: Stephen Hemminger <hidden>
Date: 2009-01-28 19:05:17

On Wed, 28 Jan 2009 10:05:29 -0800
Roland Dreier [off-list ref] wrote:
 > > but actually I still don't see how it's safe for a net driver to
 > > call skb_linearize() from its transmit routine, since there's a
 > > chance that that will unconditionally enable BHs?
 > 
 > It's simply not allowed.
 > 
 > dev_queue_xmit() at a higher level can do __skb_linearize()
 > because it does so before doing the rcu_read_lock_bh().

OK, thanks... what confused me is that several other drivers also do
skb_linearize() in their hard_start_xmit method... eg bnx2x,
via-velocity, mv643xx_eth.  So there are several other lurking bugs to
deal with here I guess.

 - R.
They all look like lurking (and untested) bug paths. mv643xx is especially
bad since it can leak skb. But it should be possible to call pull_tail
if bh is disabled (as long as irqs are enabled).
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help