Re: [ofa-general] NetEffect, iw_nes and kernel warning
From: Stephen Hemminger <hidden>
Date: 2009-01-28 19:05:17
From: Stephen Hemminger <hidden>
Date: 2009-01-28 19:05:17
On Wed, 28 Jan 2009 10:05:29 -0800 Roland Dreier [off-list ref] wrote:
> > but actually I still don't see how it's safe for a net driver to > > call skb_linearize() from its transmit routine, since there's a > > chance that that will unconditionally enable BHs? > > It's simply not allowed. > > dev_queue_xmit() at a higher level can do __skb_linearize() > because it does so before doing the rcu_read_lock_bh(). OK, thanks... what confused me is that several other drivers also do skb_linearize() in their hard_start_xmit method... eg bnx2x, via-velocity, mv643xx_eth. So there are several other lurking bugs to deal with here I guess. - R.
They all look like lurking (and untested) bug paths. mv643xx is especially bad since it can leak skb. But it should be possible to call pull_tail if bh is disabled (as long as irqs are enabled).