i did exactly that (in the original message) and it makes this test case
work but as I point out

a) it should not be necessary 
b) i get more SAs than I need
c) i can no longer say that a SA is optional (this is an error in the
pfkey/xfrm/racoon interface to combine two orthogonal concepts)
d) I am not convinced that I have resolved all cases. Needs more testing

-----Original Message-----
From: Patrick McHardy [mailto:kaber@trash.net] 
Sent: Tuesday, January 27, 2009 9:01 AM
To: Paul Moore
Cc: David Miller; netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: port bound SAs

Paul Moore wrote:

racoon

if I look at the xfrm/pfkey code in the kernel it ignores any ports

sent

down by the IKE daemon in transport mode. I actually changed the

racoon

code to include the ports and it makes no difference

Assuming you're also using setkey, try adding "unique" to your policies.