Re: 32 core net-next stack/netfilter "scaling"
From: Eric Dumazet <hidden>
Date: 2009-01-26 23:10:54
Also in:
netfilter-devel
Rick Jones a écrit :
Folks -
Under:
ftp://ftp.netperf.org/iptable_scaling
can be found netperf results and Caliper profiles for three scenarios on
a 32-core, 1.6 GHz 'Montecito' rx8640 system. An rx8640 is what HP call
a "cell based" system in that it is comprised of "cell boards" on which
reside CPU and memory resources. In this case there are four cell
boards, each with 4, dual-core Montecito processors and 1/4 of the
overall RAM. The system was configured with a mix of cell-local and
global interleaved memory, where the global interleave is on a cacheline
(128 byte) boundary (IIRC). Total RAM in the system is 256 GB. The
cells are joined via cross-bar connections. (numactl --hardware output
is available under the URL above)
There was an "I/O expander" connected to the system. This meant there
were as many distinct PCI-X domains as there were cells, and every cell
had a "local" set of PCI-X slots.
Into those slots I placed four HP AD385A PCI-X 10Gbit Ethernet NICs -
aka Neterion XFrame IIs. These were then connected to an HP ProCurve
5806 switch, which was in turn connected to three, 4P/16C, 2.3 GHz HP
DL585 G5s, each of which had a pair of HP AD386A PCIe 10Gbit Ethernet
NICs (Aka Chelsio T3C-based). They were running RHEL 5.2 I think. Each
NIC was in either a PCI-X 2.0 266 MHz slot (rx8640) or a PCIe 1.mumble
x8 slot (DL585 G5)
The kernel is from DaveM's net-next tree ca last week, multiq enabled.
The s2io driver is Neterion's out-of-tree version 2.0.36.15914 to get
multiq support. It was loaded into the kernel via:
insmod ./s2io.ko tx_steering_type=3 tx_fifo_num=8
There were then 8 tx queues and 8 rx queues per interface in the
rx8640. The "setaffinity.txt" script was used to set the IRQ affinities
to cores "closest" to the physical NIC. In all three tests all 32 cores
went to 100% utilization. At least for all incense and porpoises. (there
was some occasional idle reported by top on the full_iptables run)
A set of 64, concurrent "burst mode" netperf omni RR tests (tcp) with a
burst mode of 17 were run (ie 17 "transactions" outstanding on a
connection at one time,) with TCP_NODELAY set and the results gathered,
along with a set of Caliper profiles. The script used to launch these
can be found in "runemomniagg2.sh.txt under the URL above.
I picked an "RR" test to maximize the trips up and down the stack while
minimizing the bandwidth consumed.
I picked a burst size of 16 because that was sufficient to saturate a
single core on the rx8640.
I picked 64 concurrent netperfs because I wanted to make sure I had
enough concurrent connections to get spread across all the cores/queues
by the algorithms in place.
I picked the combination of 64 and 16 rather than say 1024 and 0 (one
tran at a time) because I didn't want to run a context switching
benchmark :)
The rx8640 was picked because it was available and I was confident it
was not going to have any hardware scaling issues getting in the way. I
wanted to see SW issues, not HW issues. I am ass-u-me-ing the rx8640 is
a reasonable analog for any "decent or better scaling" 32 core hardware
and that while there are ia64-specific routines present in the profiles,
they are there for platform-independent reasons.
The no_iptables/ data was run after a fresh boot, with no iptables
commands run and so no iptables related modules loaded into the kernel.
The empty_iptables/ data was run after an "iptables --list" command
which loaded one or two modules into the kernel.
The full_iptables/ data was run after an "iptables-restore" command
pointed at full_iptables/iptables.txt which was created from what RH
creates by default when one enables firewall via their installer, with a
port range added by me to allow pretty much anything netperf would ask.
As such, while it does excercise netfilter functionality, I cannot make
any claims as to its "real world" applicability. (while the firewall
settings came from an RH setup, FWIW, the base bits running on the
rx8640 are Debian Lenny, with the net-next kernel on top)
The "cycles" profile is able to grab flat profile hits while interrupts
are disabled so it can see stuff happening while interrupts are
disabled. The "scgprof" profile is an attempt to get some call graphs -
it does not have visibility into code running with interrupts disabled.
The "cache" profile is a profile that looks to get some cache miss
information.
So, having said all that, details can be found under the previously
mentioned URL. Some quick highlights:
no_iptables - ~22000 transactions/s/netperf. Top of the cycles profile
looks like:
Function Summary
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
% Total
IP Cumulat IP
Samples % of Samples
(ETB) Total (ETB) Function File
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
5.70 5.70 37772 s2io.ko::tx_intr_handler
5.14 10.84 34012 vmlinux::__ia64_readq
4.88 15.72 32285 s2io.ko::s2io_msix_ring_handle
4.63 20.34 30625 s2io.ko::rx_intr_handler
4.60 24.94 30429 s2io.ko::s2io_xmit
3.85 28.79 25488 s2io.ko::s2io_poll_msix
2.87 31.65 18987 vmlinux::dev_queue_xmit
2.51 34.16 16620 vmlinux::tcp_sendmsg
2.51 36.67 16588 vmlinux::tcp_ack
2.15 38.82 14221 vmlinux::__inet_lookup_established
2.10 40.92 13937 vmlinux::ia64_spinlock_contention
empty_iptables - ~12000 transactions/s/netperf. Top of the cycles
profile looks like:
Function Summary
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
% Total
IP Cumulat IP
Samples % of Samples
(ETB) Total (ETB) Function File
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
26.38 26.38 137458 vmlinux::_read_lock_bh
10.63 37.01 55388 vmlinux::local_bh_enable_ip
3.42 40.43 17812 s2io.ko::tx_intr_handler
3.01 43.44 15691 ip_tables.ko::ipt_do_table
2.90 46.34 15100 vmlinux::__ia64_readq
2.72 49.06 14179 s2io.ko::rx_intr_handler
2.55 51.61 13288 s2io.ko::s2io_xmit
1.98 53.59 10329 s2io.ko::s2io_msix_ring_handle
1.75 55.34 9104 vmlinux::dev_queue_xmit
1.64 56.98 8546 s2io.ko::s2io_poll_msix
1.52 58.50 7943 vmlinux::sock_wfree
1.40 59.91 7302 vmlinux::tcp_ack
full_iptables - some test instances didn't complete, I think they got
starved. Of those which did complete, their performance ranged all the
way from 330 to 3100 transactions/s/netperf. Top of the cycles profile
looks like:
Function Summary
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
% Total
IP Cumulat IP
Samples % of Samples
(ETB) Total (ETB) Function File
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
64.71 64.71 582171 vmlinux::_write_lock_bh
18.43 83.14 165822 vmlinux::ia64_spinlock_contention
2.86 85.99 25709 nf_conntrack.ko::init_module
2.36 88.35 21194 nf_conntrack.ko::tcp_packet
1.78 90.13 16009 vmlinux::_spin_lock_bh
1.20 91.33 10810 nf_conntrack.ko::nf_conntrack_in
1.20 92.52 10755 vmlinux::nf_iterate
1.09 93.62 9833 vmlinux::default_idle
0.26 93.88 2331 vmlinux::__ia64_readq
0.25 94.12 2213 vmlinux::__interrupt
0.24 94.37 2203 s2io.ko::tx_intr_handler
Suggestions as to things to look at/with and/or patches to try are
welcome. I should have the HW available to me for at least a little
while, but not indefinitely.
rick jonesHi Rick, nice hardware you have :) Stephen had a patch to nuke read_lock() from iptables, using RCU and seqlocks. I hit this contention point even with low cost hardware, and quite standard application. I pinged him few days ago to try to finish the job with him, but it seems Stephen is busy at the moment. Then conntrack (tcp sessions) is awfull, since it uses a single rwlock_t tcp_lock that must be write_locked() for basically every handled tcp frame... How long is "not indefinitely" ?