Re: [patch] locking, percpu counters: introduce separate lock classes
From: Ingo Molnar <hidden>
Date: 2008-12-30 07:22:00
Also in:
lkml
From: Ingo Molnar <hidden>
Date: 2008-12-30 07:22:00
Also in:
lkml
* David Miller [off-list ref] wrote:
From: Ingo Molnar <redacted> Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2008 07:56:50 +0100quoted
* David Miller [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
From: Ingo Molnar <redacted> Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2008 07:05:36 +0100quoted
One small nit: could you please add the Reported-by line for Jeff Kirscher who reported the problem originally: Reported-by: Jeff Kirsher [off-list ref]I'll make sure to add that to the commit message after you successfully test Herbert's patch. Thanks.early indications are good: after about 15 random bootup tests the lockdep warning has not triggered. (it would trigger on every 2nd kernel before that - there's a 66% chance for lockdep to be enabled in my randconfig tests)Sounds good. I'll toss this into my net-2.6 tree, with Jeff's reported-by and your Tested-by, and send this off to Linus tonight.
cool. If by tonight you dont get a followup mail from me then you can assume that the patch passed hundreds of tests here. Ingo