Re: CIFS regression in 2.6.27.8
From: Steven French <hidden>
Date: 2008-12-08 21:10:55
Also in:
lkml
Yes - they look distinct Steve French Senior Software Engineer Linux Technology Center - IBM Austin phone: 512-838-2294 email: sfrench at-sign us dot ibm dot com Stefan Richter [off-list ref] 12/08/2008 02:58 PM To "Rafael J. Wysocki" [off-list ref] cc Pekka Enberg [off-list ref], Dennis Hardy [off-list ref], linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, layton@redhat.com, Steven French/Austin/IBM@IBMUS, Greg KH [off-list ref], netdev@vger.kernel.org, Holger Hoffstaette [off-list ref] Subject Re: CIFS regression in 2.6.27.8 Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
quoted
On Mon, Dec 8, 2008 at 8:18 PM, Dennis Hardy [off-list ref]
wrote:
quoted
quoted
I just mounted a network drive (Windows Server) via CIFS under
2.6.27.8, and
quoted
quoted
the sizes reported by "df" are completely incorrect:
...
quoted
quoted
Does anyone else see this sort of behavior with 2.6.27.8? This worked
fine
quoted
quoted
in 2.6.27.6 (we skipped 2.6.27.7)...
There were several cifs updates in .8 but AFAIU none in .7.
FWIW, it seems to be related to this one:
http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/12/8/7 Holger's report is about the userland SMB/CIFS server, while Denis's is about kernelspace client code. They look like separate issues to me. -- Stefan Richter -=====-==--- ==-- -=--- http://arcgraph.de/sr/