Re: [PATCH 02/13] dmaengine: remove dependency on async_tx
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date: 2008-11-15 06:02:35
Also in:
lkml
On Fri, 14 Nov 2008 14:34:27 -0700 Dan Williams [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
async_tx.ko is a consumer of dma channels. A circular dependency arises if modules in drivers/dma rely on common code in async_tx.ko. It prevents either module from being unloaded. Move dma_wait_for_async_tx and async_tx_run_dependencies to dmaeninge.o where they should have been from the beginning. ...--- a/drivers/dma/dmaengine.c +++ b/drivers/dma/dmaengine.c@@ -623,6 +623,81 @@ void dma_async_tx_descriptor_init(struct dma_async_tx_descriptor *tx, } EXPORT_SYMBOL(dma_async_tx_descriptor_init); +/* dma_wait_for_async_tx - spin wait for a transcation to complete
yuo cnat sepll
+ * @tx: transaction to wait on
+ */
+enum dma_status
+dma_wait_for_async_tx(struct dma_async_tx_descriptor *tx)
+{
+ enum dma_status status;
+ struct dma_async_tx_descriptor *iter;
+ struct dma_async_tx_descriptor *parent;
+
+ if (!tx)
+ return DMA_SUCCESS;
+
+ /* poll through the dependency chain, return when tx is complete */
+ do {
+ iter = tx;
+
+ /* find the root of the unsubmitted dependency chain */
+ do {
+ parent = iter->parent;
+ if (!parent)
+ break;
+ else
+ iter = parent;
+ } while (parent);
+
+ /* there is a small window for ->parent == NULL and
+ * ->cookie == -EBUSY
+ */
+ while (iter->cookie == -EBUSY)
+ cpu_relax();
+
+ status = dma_sync_wait(iter->chan, iter->cookie);
+ } while (status == DMA_IN_PROGRESS || (iter != tx));
+
+ return status;
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(dma_wait_for_async_tx);hm, strange. The unlocked list walk assumes that this thread of control has exclusive access to *tx (somehow??), but this thread of control doesn't end up freeing *tx. I guess the caller does that.
+/* dma_run_dependencies - helper routine for dma drivers to process
+ * (start) dependent operations on their target channel
+ * @tx: transaction with dependencies
+ */
+void dma_run_dependencies(struct dma_async_tx_descriptor *tx)
+{
+ struct dma_async_tx_descriptor *dep = tx->next;
+ struct dma_async_tx_descriptor *dep_next;
+ struct dma_chan *chan;
+
+ if (!dep)
+ return;
+
+ chan = dep->chan;
+
+ /* keep submitting up until a channel switch is detected
+ * in that case we will be called again as a result of
+ * processing the interrupt from async_tx_channel_switch
+ */
+ for (; dep; dep = dep_next) {
+ spin_lock_bh(&dep->lock);
+ dep->parent = NULL;
+ dep_next = dep->next;
+ if (dep_next && dep_next->chan == chan)
+ dep->next = NULL; /* ->next will be submitted */
+ else
+ dep_next = NULL; /* submit current dep and terminate */
+ spin_unlock_bh(&dep->lock);
+
+ dep->tx_submit(dep);
+ }
+
+ chan->device->device_issue_pending(chan);
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(dma_run_dependencies);Now there's a lock.