Re: [BUG] rmmod bfin_mac netdev driver module will cause system crash.
From: "Bryan Wu" <cooloney@kernel.org>
Date: 2008-11-07 16:43:30
On Sat, Nov 8, 2008 at 12:41 AM, Lennert Buytenhek [off-list ref] wrote:
On Sat, Nov 08, 2008 at 12:36:08AM +0800, Bryan Wu wrote:quoted
quoted
quoted
I got a regression since I update our blackfin kernel to the lastest 2.6.28-rc2 which includes your phylib patches. Please find the tracker here: https://blackfin.uclinux.org/gf/project/uclinux-dist/tracker/?action=TrackerItemEdit&tracker_id=141&tracker_item_id=4595 Briefly, the calling chain is: in bfin_mac_remove(), mdiobus_unregister() -> device_unregister(&bus->dev); -> put_device() -> kobject_put() -> kref_put(&kobj->kref, kobject_release); -> kobject_release() -> kobject_cleanup() -> mdiobus_release(). So in mdiobus_unregister() bus->state = MDIOBUS_UNREGISTERED; but in mdiobus_release(), this BUG_ON will fire: BUG_ON(bus->state != MDIOBUS_RELEASED); How about this patch? --- Index: drivers/net/phy/mdio_bus.c ===================================================================--- drivers/net/phy/mdio_bus.c (revision 5575) +++ drivers/net/phy/mdio_bus.c (working copy)@@ -134,13 +134,16 @@ int i; BUG_ON(bus->state != MDIOBUS_REGISTERED); - bus->state = MDIOBUS_UNREGISTERED; + bus->state = MDIOBUS_RELEASED; + device_unregister(&bus->dev); for (i = 0; i < PHY_MAX_ADDR; i++) { if (bus->phy_map[i]) device_unregister(&bus->phy_map[i]->dev); } + + bus->state = MDIOBUS_UNREGISTERED; } EXPORT_SYMBOL(mdiobus_unregister);---Actually, what I think should be done is this. Can you try that?diff --git a/drivers/net/phy/mdio_bus.c b/drivers/net/phy/mdio_bus.c index d0ed1ef..536bda1 100644 --- a/drivers/net/phy/mdio_bus.c +++ b/drivers/net/phy/mdio_bus.c@@ -136,7 +136,7 @@ void mdiobus_unregister(struct mii_bus *bus) BUG_ON(bus->state != MDIOBUS_REGISTERED); bus->state = MDIOBUS_UNREGISTERED; - device_unregister(&bus->dev); + device_del(&bus->dev); for (i = 0; i < PHY_MAX_ADDR; i++) { if (bus->phy_map[i]) device_unregister(&bus->phy_map[i]->dev); --Right, that's the right way. Our tester confirmed that this bug was fixed with this patch. Need I send a patch or you patched this youself?Can you please confirm on netdev@ that that patch fixes it and then I'll submit it with your Tested-by, is that okay with you?
Sorry for just clicking reply not reply-all. Tested-by is OK for me definitely, -:)) -Bryan