Re: two other cases Re: [Bug 11721] after upgrade to 2.6.27 i cannot navigate
From: Ilpo Järvinen <hidden>
Date: 2008-10-21 12:19:11
On Tue, 21 Oct 2008, Jarek Poplawski wrote:
On Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 01:51:10PM +0300, Ilpo Järvinen wrote:quoted
On Tue, 21 Oct 2008, Jarek Poplawski wrote:quoted
On Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 12:36:33PM +0300, Ilpo Järvinen wrote: ...quoted
Can you try this another debug patch below (on 2.6.27.2 is fine). It moves the mss to the last position but should keep timestamps in place by making wscale as first option. It is well possible that you won't get it working at all except with all ts,sack and wscale set to 0 (the most likely result). Please try with all wscale,sack,ts combinations (no need to provide dumps, just working/not working per case)... This should tell us for quite high certaintity what is the actual option which is causing this (would it not be the mss-at-beginning which is the most likely cause), [...]I'd like to remind it seems to work with only sack off, so mss after ts. If so, my suspicion would be around rfc's/options' dating?Thanks, I missed that case... there are so many cases already... :-) ...I'm not sure we'll find some very obvious reason for this, rfc dating probably has very little to do here. I still think that putting an alternative option in front is useful test (though my initial mss-at-beginning thought wasn't bullet-proof) but maybe we could skip all those alternative settings of wscale,sack,ts and have them just all enabled.I agree with you, but when this test with all options enabled fails (?!), IMHO disabling sack only could be enough to get it working again.
...Yes it should, but we could be all wrong and it just works with them all too :-). -- i.