Re: [Bugme-new] [Bug 11316] New: severe performance regression for iptables nat routing
From: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
Date: 2008-08-15 04:35:03
Possibly related (same subject, not in this thread)
- 2008-08-16 · Re: [Bugme-new] [Bug 11316] New: severe performance regression for iptables nat routing · Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
- 2008-08-15 · Re: [Bugme-new] [Bug 11316] New: severe performance regression for iptables nat routing · David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
- 2008-08-15 · Re: [Bugme-new] [Bug 11316] New: severe performance regression for iptables nat routing · David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
- 2008-08-15 · Re: [Bugme-new] [Bug 11316] New: severe performance regression for iptables nat routing · David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
- 2008-08-15 · Re: [Bugme-new] [Bug 11316] New: severe performance regression for iptables nat routing · David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
David Miller [off-list ref] wrote:
Patrick I wonder if there a case where iptables NAT will COW the packet when it really doesn't need to.
This doesn't make sense. He's downloading from a remote host, so GSO shouldn't even come into play. Cheers, -- Visit Openswan at http://www.openswan.org/ Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} [off-list ref] Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/ PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt