On Wed, 11 Jun 2008 17:05:10 -0300
"Rafael Almeida" [off-list ref] wrote:
I noticed no one said anything about my patch below, did I do
something terrible wrong? Should I just be more patient?
On Thu, Jun 5, 2008 at 1:34 AM, Rafael C. de Almeida
[off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
The reorder option wasn't working correctly. It would only kick in if
the gap option was set. In that case it would only lower the
probability of reordering packets because of how the if conditional
was stated.
This patch separetes the algorithm for reordering with gap from the
rest, rendering the code more readable and correct.
Signed-off-by: Rafael C. de Almeida <redacted>
Haven't had time to look at this in detail, and I worry about the impact
of changing assumptions people already have in their scripts.