Thread (6 messages) 6 messages, 3 authors, 2008-06-28

Re: [PATCH (regression)] Fragments: fix race between inet_frag_find and inet_frag_secret_rebuild

From: Jarek Poplawski <hidden>
Date: 2008-06-25 09:38:40

On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 10:42:56AM +0400, Pavel Emelyanov wrote:
Jarek Poplawski wrote:
quoted
Pavel Emelyanov wrote, On 06/24/2008 12:43 PM:
quoted
The problem is that while we work w/o the inet_frags.lock even
read-locked the secret rebuild timer may occur (on another CPU,
- since BHs are still disables in the inet_frag_find) and change 

+ since BHs are still disabled in the inet_frag_find) and change 
quoted
the rnd seed for ipv4/6 fragments.

It was caused by my patch fd9e63544cac30a34c951f0ec958038f0529e244
([INET]: Omit double hash calculations in xxx_frag_intern) late 
in the 2.6.24 kernel, so this should probably be queued to -stable.

Signed-off-by: Pavel Emelyanov <redacted>

---
diff --git a/net/ipv4/inet_fragment.c b/net/ipv4/inet_fragment.c
index 4ed429b..0546a0b 100644
--- a/net/ipv4/inet_fragment.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/inet_fragment.c
@@ -192,14 +192,21 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(inet_frag_evictor);
 
 static struct inet_frag_queue *inet_frag_intern(struct netns_frags *nf,
 		struct inet_frag_queue *qp_in, struct inet_frags *f,
-		unsigned int hash, void *arg)
+		void *arg)
 {
 	struct inet_frag_queue *qp;
 #ifdef CONFIG_SMP
 	struct hlist_node *n;
 #endif
+	unsigned int hash;
 
 	write_lock(&f->lock);
+	/*
+	 * While we stayed w/o the lock other CPU could update
+	 * the rnd seed, so we need to re-calculate the hash
+	 * chain. Fortunatelly the qp_in can be used to get one.
+	 */
+	hash = f->hashfn(qp_in);
 #ifdef CONFIG_SMP
 	/* With SMP race we have to recheck hash table, because
 	 * such entry could be created on other cpu, while we
Maybe it's a matter of taste: since there is this "#ifdef CONFIG_SMP",
and the new comment concerns with "other CPU", why this re-calculation
isn't done only for SMP? 
Because the hash value is required also *outside* this ifdef and adding
a fancier logic is probably not good for a -rc7 fix.
I'm not sure what fancier logic do you mean: I've thought about simply
leaving the "hash" as functions argument as it is, and only adding this
recalculation under #ifdef CONFIG_SMP, but I can miss something...

Jarek P.
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help