Re: [PATCH (regression)] Fragments: fix race between inet_frag_find and inet_frag_secret_rebuild
From: Jarek Poplawski <hidden>
Date: 2008-06-25 09:38:40
On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 10:42:56AM +0400, Pavel Emelyanov wrote:
Jarek Poplawski wrote:quoted
Pavel Emelyanov wrote, On 06/24/2008 12:43 PM:quoted
The problem is that while we work w/o the inet_frags.lock even read-locked the secret rebuild timer may occur (on another CPU,- since BHs are still disables in the inet_frag_find) and change + since BHs are still disabled in the inet_frag_find) and changequoted
the rnd seed for ipv4/6 fragments. It was caused by my patch fd9e63544cac30a34c951f0ec958038f0529e244 ([INET]: Omit double hash calculations in xxx_frag_intern) late in the 2.6.24 kernel, so this should probably be queued to -stable. Signed-off-by: Pavel Emelyanov <redacted> ---diff --git a/net/ipv4/inet_fragment.c b/net/ipv4/inet_fragment.c index 4ed429b..0546a0b 100644 --- a/net/ipv4/inet_fragment.c +++ b/net/ipv4/inet_fragment.c@@ -192,14 +192,21 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(inet_frag_evictor); static struct inet_frag_queue *inet_frag_intern(struct netns_frags *nf, struct inet_frag_queue *qp_in, struct inet_frags *f, - unsigned int hash, void *arg) + void *arg) { struct inet_frag_queue *qp; #ifdef CONFIG_SMP struct hlist_node *n; #endif + unsigned int hash; write_lock(&f->lock); + /* + * While we stayed w/o the lock other CPU could update + * the rnd seed, so we need to re-calculate the hash + * chain. Fortunatelly the qp_in can be used to get one. + */ + hash = f->hashfn(qp_in); #ifdef CONFIG_SMP /* With SMP race we have to recheck hash table, because * such entry could be created on other cpu, while weMaybe it's a matter of taste: since there is this "#ifdef CONFIG_SMP", and the new comment concerns with "other CPU", why this re-calculation isn't done only for SMP?Because the hash value is required also *outside* this ifdef and adding a fancier logic is probably not good for a -rc7 fix.
I'm not sure what fancier logic do you mean: I've thought about simply leaving the "hash" as functions argument as it is, and only adding this recalculation under #ifdef CONFIG_SMP, but I can miss something... Jarek P.