From: Miika Komu <redacted>
Date: Mon, 5 May 2008 08:55:49 +0300 (EEST)

On Tue, 29 Apr 2008, David Miller wrote:

quoted

From: Miika Komu <redacted>
Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2008 00:07:56 +0300 (EEST)

This is not how we do things.

When the HIP implementation is submitted for inclusion, the module
exports can be added, not before.

I am sorry but this somewhat conflicts with your earlier statement:

http://www.linux.sgi.com/archives/netdev/2005-03/msg01214.html

We took an huge effort in our project to move the HIP implementation to 
the userland. I feel puzzled on how to continue. Please give some advice?

I didn't say I would accept a HIP implementation into the
kernel, I'm speaking in general terms about exporting symbols
for new features that aren't in the tree yet.

Does that make you feel better?