Thread (20 messages) flat view 20 messages, 9 authors, 2008-03-05

Re: locking api self-test hanging

From: Stephen Hemminger <hidden>
Date: 2008-03-04 15:52:23

On Tue, 4 Mar 2008 01:10:50 -0800
Andrew Morton [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
On Tue, 4 Mar 2008 08:40:24 +0000 Jarek Poplawski [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
On 04-03-2008 06:05, Andrew Morton wrote:
...
quoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
And I've fully bisected this hang twice and both times came up with

commit 33f807ba0d9259e7c75c7a2ce8bd2787e5b540c7
Author: Stephen Hemminger [off-list ref]
Date:   Mon Nov 19 19:24:52 2007 -0800

    [NETPOLL]: Kill NETPOLL_RX_DROP, set but never tested.

which is stupid because that patch doesn't do anything.
...or maybe apparently doesn't do anything?
@@ -128,13 +127,11 @@ static int poll_one_napi(struct netpoll_info *npinfo,
        if (!test_bit(NAPI_STATE_SCHED, &napi->state))
                return budget;
 
-       npinfo->rx_flags |= NETPOLL_RX_DROP;

But in a next patch we can see:
@@ -51,12 +50,12 @@ static inline int netpoll_rx(struct sk_buff *skb)
        unsigned long flags;
        int ret = 0;
 
-       if (!npinfo || (!npinfo->rx_np && !npinfo->rx_flags))
+       if (!npinfo || !npinfo->rx_np)
So, it seems rx_flags could have been tested here for NETPOLL_RX_DROP
yet?
Oh damn.  I bisected this three times and the second two times both landed on
this:


commit 33f807ba0d9259e7c75c7a2ce8bd2787e5b540c7
Author: Stephen Hemminger [off-list ref]
Date:   Mon Nov 19 19:24:52 2007 -0800

    [NETPOLL]: Kill NETPOLL_RX_DROP, set but never tested.
    
    Signed-off-by: Stephen Hemminger [off-list ref]
    Signed-off-by: David S. Miller [off-list ref]
diff --git a/net/core/netpoll.c b/net/core/netpoll.c
index cf6acd3..9e3aea0 100644
--- a/net/core/netpoll.c
+++ b/net/core/netpoll.c
@@ -40,7 +40,6 @@ static atomic_t trapped;
 
 #define USEC_PER_POLL	50
 #define NETPOLL_RX_ENABLED  1
-#define NETPOLL_RX_DROP     2
 
 #define MAX_SKB_SIZE \
 		(MAX_UDP_CHUNK + sizeof(struct udphdr) + \
@@ -128,13 +127,11 @@ static int poll_one_napi(struct netpoll_info *npinfo,
 	if (!test_bit(NAPI_STATE_SCHED, &napi->state))
 		return budget;
 
-	npinfo->rx_flags |= NETPOLL_RX_DROP;
 	atomic_inc(&trapped);
 
 	work = napi->poll(napi, budget);
 
 	atomic_dec(&trapped);
-	npinfo->rx_flags &= ~NETPOLL_RX_DROP;
 
 	return budget - work;
 }
@@ -475,7 +472,7 @@ int __netpoll_rx(struct sk_buff *skb)
 	if (skb->dev->type != ARPHRD_ETHER)
 		goto out;
 
-	/* check if netpoll clients need ARP */
+	/* if receive ARP during middle of NAPI poll, then queue */
 	if (skb->protocol == htons(ETH_P_ARP) &&
 	    atomic_read(&trapped)) {
 		skb_queue_tail(&npi->arp_tx, skb);
@@ -537,6 +534,9 @@ int __netpoll_rx(struct sk_buff *skb)
 	return 1;
 
 out:
+	/* If packet received while already in poll then just
+	 * silently drop.
+	 */
 	if (atomic_read(&trapped)) {
 		kfree_skb(skb);
 		return 1;
and I stupidly assumed that it couldn't be this commit because it was a
no-op.  I didn't think to look for an _impicit_ test of NETPOLL_RX_DROP
such as the one above.  That's pretty poor style IMO :(


That bisecting took me several hours and at the time I hoped that it would
receive a more-than-zero response.  btw.
Mia culpa, individual tests of the netconsole when I did the patch worked.
But obviously didn't stress it enough or trigger that drop code.

Plus, I didn't believe the bisect.
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help