Re: [PATCH/RFC v2] introduce ARCH_CAN_UNALIGNED_ACCESS Kconfig symbol
From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Date: 2008-03-20 21:13:08
Also in:
linux-wireless, lkml
From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Date: 2008-03-20 21:13:08
Also in:
linux-wireless, lkml
From: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net> Date: Thu, 20 Mar 2008 19:39:33 +0100
In many cases, especially in networking, it can be beneficial to know at compile time whether the architecture can do unaligned accesses. This patch introduces a new Kconfig symbol ARCH_CAN_UNALIGNED_ACCESS for that purpose and adds it to the powerpc and x86 architectures. Also add some documentation about alignment and networking, and especially one intended use of this symbol. Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>
I think you're semantically testing the wrong thing. It's not if unaligned accesses are supported, it's if they are efficient enough or not. For example, sparc64 fully handles unaligned accesses but taking the trap to fix it up is slow. So sparc64 "can" handle unaligned accesses, but whether we want to set this symbol or not is another matter.