Re: WARN_ON() hit in fsl bitbanged phy driver
From: Scott Wood <hidden>
Date: 2008-02-11 22:26:09
Also in:
linuxppc-dev
Rune Torgersen wrote:
Scott Wood wrote:quoted
Rune Torgersen wrote:quoted
I hit the following WARN_ON when using mii-tools agains a ethernet interface using a bit-banged mii interfaceIt looks like the kernel thinks it's in an interrupt, even though it clearly isn't from the backtrace. Presumably, something slept from an interrupt handler; try turning on sleep-in-spinlock debugging.I turned on sleep-in-spinlock and it did not reveal anything. I'm trying some other debug options.quoted
The root cause was probably something other than the phy code.I'm not so sure, because it only happens when I run mii-tool agains the interface useing the bit-banged driver, and then only the first time.
OK, it seems I should have checked 2.6.24 instead of head-of-tree; softirq.c:139 is a different assertion than I thought. It's not in_irq(), but irqs_disabled(). fs_ioctl() is disabling interrupts, and spin_unlock_bh() doesn't like that. The current use of mutexes likes it even less. The locking should be moved inside the phy bus implementation, if it's needed at all. It only happens once because it's a WARN_ON_ONCE(). :-) -Scott