Re: [Bugme-new] [Bug 10071] New: kernel hang in inet_init
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date: 2008-02-25 22:00:34
Also in:
linux-acpi
On Sat, 23 Feb 2008 00:34:06 -0800 (PST) bugme-daemon@bugzilla.kernel.org wrote:
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10071 Summary: kernel hang in inet_init Product: Networking Version: 2.5 KernelVersion: 2.6.25 rc2 latest git Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Tree: Mainline Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P1 Component: IPV4 AssignedTo: shemminger@linux-foundation.org ReportedBy: yannick.dirou@axetic.com Distribution:ubuntu hardy Hardware Environment:dell dimension 5150 Problem Description: kernel hang mostly but boot slowly sometimes Steps to reproduce: boot when the computer manage to boot, inet_init last some time: [ 1.725306] NET: Registered protocol family 2 [ 6.825384] IP route cache hash table entries: 32768 (order: 5, 131072 bytes) [ 6.825803] TCP established hash table entries: 131072 (order: 8, 1048576 bytes) [ 6.826691] TCP bind hash table entries: 65536 (order: 9, 2359296 bytes) [ 6.836160] TCP: Hash tables configured (established 131072 bind 65536) [ 6.836255] TCP reno registered [ 7.081569] initcall 0xc03b8920: inet_init+0x0/0x3aa() returned 0. [ 7.081569] initcall 0xc03b8920 ran for 5106 msecs: inet_init+0x0/0x3aa() When booting with acpi=ht it works: [0.124668] Calling initcall 0xc03b8920: inet_init+0x0/0x3aa() [ 0.124867] NET: Registered protocol family 2 [ 0.288067] IP route cache hash table entries: 32768 (order: 5, 131072 bytes) [ 0.288856] TCP established hash table entries: 131072 (order: 8, 1048576 bytes) [ 0.289739] TCP bind hash table entries: 65536 (order: 9, 2359296 bytes) [ 0.299156] TCP: Hash tables configured (established 131072 bind 65536) [ 0.299250] TCP reno registered Feb 23 09:10:28 tiyann kernel: [ 0.162267] initcall 0xc03b8920: inet_init+0x0/0x3aa() returned 0. [ 0.162383] initcall 0xc03b8920 ran for 33 msecs: inet_init+0x0/0x3aa() there seem to be a weird interaction between acpi and inet_init any hint on how to provide better information thanks