From: Timo_Teräs <redacted>
Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2008 09:38:15 +0200
David Miller wrote:
quoted
From: Timo_Teräs <redacted>
Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2008 08:27:14 +0200
quoted
I don't know about netlink. But pfkey works in *BSD too and it is RFC'd.
So I'd say pfkey might be a bit more portable. Though netlink is definitely
more robust and extensive.
The RFCs say absolutely nothing about policy interfaces for AF_KEY,
everybody rolls their own in slightly incompatible ways.
It is therefore anything but standardized.
Yes, there's non-standardized extensions.
You can't implement a keying daemon without policy support, and policy
support is where the "non-standardized extensions" live.
Doing anything other than "life support" bug fixes for AF_KEY is
inappropriate.