Re: [PATCH] XFRM: SPD auditing fix to include the netmask/prefix-length

[PATCH] XFRM: SPD auditing fix to include the netmask/prefix-length · Paul Moore <hidden> · 2007-11-26
Re: [PATCH] XFRM: SPD auditing fix to include the netmask/prefix-length · Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au> · 2007-11-29
Re: [PATCH] XFRM: SPD auditing fix to include the netmask/prefix-length · Paul Moore <hidden> · 2007-11-29
Re: [PATCH] XFRM: SPD auditing fix to include the netmask/prefix-length · Paul Moore <hidden> · 2007-11-30
Re: [PATCH] XFRM: SPD auditing fix to include the netmask/prefix-length · Joy Latten <hidden> · 2007-11-30
Re: [PATCH] XFRM: SPD auditing fix to include the netmask/prefix-length · Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au> · 2007-12-01
Re: [PATCH] XFRM: SPD auditing fix to include the netmask/prefix-length · Paul Moore <hidden> · 2007-12-03

From: Paul Moore <hidden>
Date: 2007-12-03 04:52:09

On Saturday 01 December 2007 7:28:34 am Herbert Xu wrote:

On Fri, Nov 30, 2007 at 09:51:48AM -0500, Paul Moore wrote:

quoted

Steve and/or Joy, could we get a verdict on this issue?  The lack of a
netmask in the SPD audit messages is pretty serious so I'd like to see
this fixed as soon as possible.

I'll take the resounding silence as an indication of approval :)

Patch applied to net-2.6.25.  Thanks Paul.

Thanks Herbert.  If I hear any grumblings from the audit folks I'll send out 
another patch to make the prefix length a permanent fixture.

-- 
paul moore
linux security @ hp

`h`	back out one level
`j`	next message in thread
`k`	previous message in thread
`l`	drill in
`Esc`	close help / fold thread tree
`?`	toggle this help