Re: wireless vs. alignment requirements
From: Stephen Hemminger <hidden>
Date: 2007-11-27 18:39:40
Also in:
linux-wireless
On Tue, 27 Nov 2007 09:16:07 -0800 "H. Peter Anvin" [off-list ref] wrote:
Stephen Hemminger wrote:quoted
Herbert Xu wrote:quoted
On Sat, Nov 24, 2007 at 02:49:36PM +0100, Johannes Berg wrote:quoted
Right. I just didn't think that would be a valid value for an architecture to set.OK. Let me clarify this a bit more. We require at least one of the following rules to be met: * the IPv4/IPv6 header is aligned by 8 bytes on reception; * or the platform provides unaligned exception handlers. So if your platform violates both rules then it won't work with the IP stack, simple as that. Fortunately I don't think such a platform exists currently on Linux. Cheers,Then what about hardware that can't dma ethernet to non-aligned address. Sky2 hardware breaks if DMA is not 8 byte aligned. IMHO the IP stack should handle any alignment, and do the appropriate memove if the CPU requires alignment.I wrote a patch for the IP stack to realign packets if necessary at one point. I should dredge it up again and submit it for collective flamage. -hpa
Is there any standard kernel config define for "this platform can't do unaligned accesses"? -- Stephen Hemminger [off-list ref]