Re: [PATCH 2/2] NFS: handle IPv6 addresses in nfs ctl
From: Aurélien Charbon <hidden>
Date: 2007-11-05 15:16:29
Possibly related (same subject, not in this thread)
- 2007-10-31 · Re: [PATCH 2/2] NFS: handle IPv6 addresses in nfs ctl · J. Bruce Fields <hidden>
- 2007-10-31 · Re: [PATCH 2/2] NFS: handle IPv6 addresses in nfs ctl · Aurélien Charbon <hidden>
- 2007-10-30 · Re: [PATCH 2/2] NFS: handle IPv6 addresses in nfs ctl · Brian Haley <hidden>
- 2007-10-30 · [PATCH 2/2] NFS: handle IPv6 addresses in nfs ctl · Aurélien Charbon <hidden>
- 2007-10-29 · Re: [PATCH 2/2] NFS: handle IPv6 addresses in nfs ctl · Brian Haley <hidden>
Hi Neil, Thank you for the reply. Neil Brown wrote:
quoted
I think this patch is unnecessary and hence not wanted. The getfs / getfs calls should be considered legacy calls. Adding functionality to them is not appropriate.
I agree with that.
But I don't think we really add functionality here.
Modifications are just necessary to match the auth_unix_lookup new
prototype.
I don't see how we can avoid that.
Aurélien
--
********************************
Aurelien Charbon
Linux NFSv4 team
Bull SAS
Echirolles - France
http://nfsv4.bullopensource.org/
********************************