Re: bonding sysfs output

Andrew Morton [off-list ref] writes:

On Tue, 27 Nov 2007 10:56:43 +0100 Ferenc Wagner [off-list ref] wrote:

quoted

quoted

- raise patches against the latest Linus tree
(ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v2.6/snapshots/)

I thought it was better to change to git.  Isn't it so?
SubmittingPatches has nothing to say about that...
Can I find collected best practices somewhere?  Which tree, which
branch, how/when to rebase, format-patch, etc...

gosh.  Documentation/Submit*,
http://www.zip.com.au/~akpm/linux/patches/stuff/tpp.txt,
http://linux.yyz.us/patch-format.html, other places.  Probably people have
written books about it by now.  But don't sweat it - you're close enough ;)

I wonder where the information got lost...  I miss docs on submitting
patches from git ONLY.  The general documentation is pretty good and
helpful, just doesn't treat git (not using git in general, but using
it for submitting patches to the Linux kernel).  On the other hand
there's a multitude of repositories to clone times a zillion branches
to follow.  Which should be the basis of the patches?  That's not very
clear.

Anyway, find them in my previous mails.  Too bad I realised just after
the fact that cosmetic changes should go first.  Hope it's mostly OK.
-- 
Regards,
Feri.