[PATCH] proc: Fix the threaded /proc/self.
From: Eric W. Biederman <hidden>
Date: 2007-11-20 22:42:32
Also in:
lkml
Subsystem:
filesystems (vfs and infrastructure), proc filesystem, the rest · Maintainers:
Alexander Viro, Christian Brauner, Linus Torvalds
Long ago when the CLONE_THREAD support first went it someone thought it would be wise to point /proc/self at /proc/<tgid> instead of /proc/<pid>. Given that /proc/<tgid> can return information about a very different task (if enough things have been unshared) then our current process /proc/<tgid> seems blatantly wrong. So far I have yet to think up an example where the current behavior would be advantageous, and I can see several places where it is seriously non-intuitive. We may be stuck with the current broken behavior for backwards compatibility reasons but lets try fixing our ancient bug for the 2.6.25 time frame and see if anyone screams. Signed-off-by: Eric W. Biederman <redacted> --- fs/proc/base.c | 12 ++++++------ 1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/proc/base.c b/fs/proc/base.c
index 34a1821..8502436 100644
--- a/fs/proc/base.c
+++ b/fs/proc/base.c@@ -2050,22 +2050,22 @@ static int proc_self_readlink(struct dentry *dentry, char __user *buffer, int buflen) { struct pid_namespace *ns = dentry->d_sb->s_fs_info; - pid_t tgid = task_tgid_nr_ns(current, ns); + pid_t pid = task_pid_nr_ns(current, ns); char tmp[PROC_NUMBUF]; - if (!tgid) + if (!pid) return -ENOENT; - sprintf(tmp, "%d", tgid); + sprintf(tmp, "%d", pid); return vfs_readlink(dentry,buffer,buflen,tmp); } static void *proc_self_follow_link(struct dentry *dentry, struct nameidata *nd) { struct pid_namespace *ns = dentry->d_sb->s_fs_info; - pid_t tgid = task_tgid_nr_ns(current, ns); + pid_t pid = task_pid_nr_ns(current, ns); char tmp[PROC_NUMBUF]; - if (!tgid) + if (!pid) return ERR_PTR(-ENOENT); - sprintf(tmp, "%d", task_tgid_nr_ns(current, ns)); + sprintf(tmp, "%d", pid); return ERR_PTR(vfs_follow_link(nd,tmp)); }
--
1.5.3.rc6.17.g1911