Re: expected behavior of PF_PACKET on NETIF_F_HW_VLAN_RX device?

expected behavior of PF_PACKET on NETIF_F_HW_VLAN_RX device? · Dave Johnson <hidden> · 2007-10-31
Re: expected behavior of PF_PACKET on NETIF_F_HW_VLAN_RX device? · Stephen Hemminger <hidden> · 2007-10-31
Re: expected behavior of PF_PACKET on NETIF_F_HW_VLAN_RX device? · Ben Greear <hidden> · 2007-11-01
Re: expected behavior of PF_PACKET on NETIF_F_HW_VLAN_RX device? · David Miller <davem@davemloft.net> · 2007-11-01
Re: expected behavior of PF_PACKET on NETIF_F_HW_VLAN_RX device? · Stephen Hemminger <hidden> · 2007-11-01
Re: expected behavior of PF_PACKET on NETIF_F_HW_VLAN_RX device? · Ben Greear <hidden> · 2007-11-01
Re: expected behavior of PF_PACKET on NETIF_F_HW_VLAN_RX device? · David Miller <davem@davemloft.net> · 2007-11-01
Re: expected behavior of PF_PACKET on NETIF_F_HW_VLAN_RX device? · Ben Greear <hidden> · 2007-11-01
Re: expected behavior of PF_PACKET on NETIF_F_HW_VLAN_RX device? · David Miller <davem@davemloft.net> · 2007-11-01
Re: expected behavior of PF_PACKET on NETIF_F_HW_VLAN_RX device? · Dave Johnson <hidden> · 2007-11-01
Re: expected behavior of PF_PACKET on NETIF_F_HW_VLAN_RX device? · Rick Jones <hidden> · 2007-11-01
Re: expected behavior of PF_PACKET on NETIF_F_HW_VLAN_RX device? · David Miller <davem@davemloft.net> · 2007-11-01
Re: expected behavior of PF_PACKET on NETIF_F_HW_VLAN_RX device? · Rick Jones <hidden> · 2007-11-01
Re: expected behavior of PF_PACKET on NETIF_F_HW_VLAN_RX device? · David Miller <davem@davemloft.net> · 2007-11-01
Re: expected behavior of PF_PACKET on NETIF_F_HW_VLAN_RX device? · Rick Jones <hidden> · 2007-11-01
[PATCH 1/2] NET: Re-add VLAN tag for devices incapable of keeping it · Dave Johnson <hidden> · 2007-11-05
Re: [PATCH 1/2] NET: Re-add VLAN tag for devices incapable of keeping it · Patrick McHardy <hidden> · 2007-11-05
Re: [PATCH 1/2] NET: Re-add VLAN tag for devices incapable of keeping it · David Miller <davem@davemloft.net> · 2007-11-05
Re: [PATCH 1/2] NET: Re-add VLAN tag for devices incapable of keeping it · Patrick McHardy <hidden> · 2007-11-06
Re: [PATCH 1/2] NET: Re-add VLAN tag for devices incapable of keeping it · David Miller <davem@davemloft.net> · 2007-11-06
[PATCH 2/2] NET: Re-add VLAN tag for devices incapable of keeping it · Dave Johnson <hidden> · 2007-11-05
RE: [PATCH 2/2] NET: Re-add VLAN tag for devices incapable of keeping it · Ramkrishna Vepa <hidden> · 2007-11-06
RE: [PATCH 2/2] NET: Re-add VLAN tag for devices incapable of keeping it · Ramkrishna Vepa <hidden> · 2007-11-06
RE: [PATCH 2/2] NET: Re-add VLAN tag for devices incapable of keeping it · Dave Johnson <hidden> · 2007-11-06
Re: expected behavior of PF_PACKET on NETIF_F_HW_VLAN_RX device? · David Miller <davem@davemloft.net> · 2007-11-01
Re: expected behavior of PF_PACKET on NETIF_F_HW_VLAN_RX device? · Dave Johnson <hidden> · 2007-11-02
Re: expected behavior of PF_PACKET on NETIF_F_HW_VLAN_RX device? · "Michael Chan" <mchan@broadcom.com> · 2007-11-02
Re: expected behavior of PF_PACKET on NETIF_F_HW_VLAN_RX device? · David Miller <davem@davemloft.net> · 2007-11-02

From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Date: 2007-11-01 22:00:13
Also in: lkml

From: Rick Jones <redacted>
Date: Thu, 01 Nov 2007 14:48:45 -0700

One could I suppose try to ammend the information passed to allow
tcpdump to say "oh, this was a tx packet on the same machine on
which I am tracing so don't worry about checksum mismatch"

We do this already!

`h`	back out one level
`j`	next message in thread
`k`	previous message in thread
`l`	drill in
`Esc`	close help / fold thread tree
`?`	toggle this help