Re: [PATCH] proc_fs.h redux
From: Bernhard Walle <hidden>
Date: 2007-10-28 12:00:13
Also in:
linux-arch, lkml
From: Bernhard Walle <hidden>
Date: 2007-10-28 12:00:13
Also in:
linux-arch, lkml
* Russell King [off-list ref] [2007-10-28 11:34]:
If you go down that route, you end up with _lots_ of circular dependencies - header file X needs Y needs Z which needs X. We've been there, several times. It very quickly becomes quite unmaintainable - you end up with hard to predict behaviour from include files. The only realistic solution is to use forward declarations.
In header files, yes. But that's not true for implementation files. Thanks, Bernhard