Re: Please pull 'z1211' branch of wireless-2.6
From: Michael Buesch <hidden>
Date: 2007-09-19 19:26:11
Also in:
linux-wireless
On Wednesday 19 September 2007 20:59:03 David Miller wrote:
From: "John W. Linville" <redacted> Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2007 14:10:05 -0400quoted
This patch adds z1211 (previously known as zd1211rw-mac80211), a driver for Zydas ZD1211 hardware. This driver has proven very robust -- Fedora 7 uses this driver and I don't think I have any open bugzillas for it. Either the driver works well, or no one as using it...given the common availability of the hardware, I have to presume the former. :-) This driver is mostly a port of zd1211rw to the mac80211 infrastructure. In fact, most zd1211rw patches have been mirrored directly to this driver for some time. I considered merely updating the existing driver with this code, but I think it is more prudent to include this as a separate driver just to avoid confusion. There is some symbol clash between the two drivers, so I add a Kconfig hack to ensure that only one or the other is built-in or that this one is built as a module. The maintainers have identified some (IMHO minor) issues with the mac80211 port of this driver. Some of them are summarized here: http://linuxwireless.org/en/users/Drivers/zd1211rw/mac80211Issues Still, I think we would be better-off having this driver upstream.Agreed, merged into net-2.6.24, thanks John.
John, please also note that the following patch is not merged, yet. http://bu3sch.de/patches/wireless-dev/20070915-1740/patches/006-zd-fix-tx-status.patch Without it ratecontrol does not work. It does neither scale the rate up nor down. This patch fixes both. I think it got lost in a (really unrelated to the actual bug) discussion about whether it's required or not to report status in mac80211 drivers. (It turned out that it _is_ required). -- Greetings Michael.