Thread (1 message) 1 message, 1 author, 2007-09-19

Re: [LARTC] ifb and ppp

From: Patrick McHardy <hidden>
Date: 2007-09-19 13:11:54

Frithjof Hammer wrote:
My goal is to setup an ingress traffic shaping on my PPPOE DSL line with ifb. 

My old imq stuff used iptables marks (like 'iptables -t mangle -A 
PREROUTING -p tcp --sport 22 -m length --length :500 -j MARK --set-mark 31') 
to classify the traffic and since i am lazy, i tried to to reuse them with 
ifb. But no luck: iptables marks the packets well, but tc doesn't see the 
marks on ifb0.

May be my problem is somewhere between ppp0 and ifb0, so for a basic test, I 
tried this:

tc qdisc add dev ppp0 ingress
modprobe ifb
ip link set up dev ifb0
tc filter add dev ppp0 parent ffff: protocol ip prio 10 u32 \
   match u32 0 0 flowid 1:1 \
   action mirred egress redirect dev ifb0

and run:

root@router:/# tcpdump -i ifb0 -n
tcpdump: WARNING: ifb0: no IPv4 address assigned
tcpdump: verbose output suppressed, use -v or -vv for full protocol decode
listening on ifb0, link-type EN10MB (Ethernet), capture size 96 bytes
12:38:29.584451 PPPoE  [ses 0x7dc] IP 217.10.79.2.10000 > 84.189.95.184.1024: 
UDP, length 84
12:38:29.585924 PPPoE  [ses 0x7dc] IP 84.189.5.17 > 84.189.95.184: GREv1, call 
24388, seq 1868, ack 3210, length 205: compressed PPP data
12:38:29.600506 PPPoE  [ses 0x7dc] IP truncated-ip - 256 bytes missing! 
24.163.113.160.34247 > 84.189.95.184.9025: UDP, length 359
[...]

Looks like the packetes are still pppoe en-capsuled. Is this the correct 
behavior? This only occurs on ppp0, on other devices (like eth0) my iptables 
marks are matched by tc. What can I do to get my iptables marks working on 
ppp0 again?

Does this patch help?

Attachments

Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help