Re: 2.6.23-rc5: possible irq lock inversion dependency detected

On Tue, 2007-11-09 at 10:18 +0800, Herbert Xu wrote:

Jamal, it's the police_lock that we need to make _bh.  The
ingress_lock is already _bh because of the spin_lock_bh that
directly precedes it.

Oh and I think the same thing applies for the other actions
too.

ga-Dang. Ok, here it is. If you see(?) any more farts let me know.
I am around for another 30 minutes and off for about 18 hours.
 
Christian, i took your config and qos setup but I cant reproduce the
issue - i think i may need some of that wireless setup to recreate. So
if you can test this and validate it works we can push it forward.

cheers,
jamal