Re: RFC: issues concerning the next NAPI interface
From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Date: 2007-08-24 21:43:56
Also in:
linuxppc-dev, lkml
From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Date: 2007-08-24 21:43:56
Also in:
linuxppc-dev, lkml
From: linas@austin.ibm.com (Linas Vepstas) Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2007 11:45:41 -0500
In the end, I just let it be, and let the system work as a busy-beaver, with the high interrupt rate. Is this a wise thing to do?
The tradeoff is always going to be latency vs. throughput. A sane default should defer enough to catch multiple packets coming in at something close to line rate, but not so much that latency unduly suffers.