Re: [PATCH 00/23] per device dirty throttling -v8
From: <hidden>
Date: 2007-08-09 05:15:46
Also in:
linux-mm, lkml
On Sat, 4 Aug 2007, Ray Lee wrote:
On 8/4/07, david@lang.hm [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
On Sat, 4 Aug 2007, Ingo Molnar wrote:At least on a surface level, your report has some similarities to http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/5/21/84 . In that message, John Miller mentions several things he tried without effect: < - I increased the max allowed receive buffer through < proc/sys/net/core/rmem_max and the application calls the right < syscall. "netstat -su" does not show any "packet receive errors".
mercury1:/proc/sys/net/core# cat rmem_*
124928
131071
mercury1:/proc/sys/net/core# netstat -su
Udp:
697853177 packets received
10025642 packets to unknown port received.
191726680 packet receive errors
63194 packets sent
RcvbufErrors: 191726680
UdpLite:
mercury1:/proc/sys/net/core# echo "512000" >rmem_max
< - After getting "kernel: swapper: page allocation failure. < order:0, mode:0x20", I increased /proc/sys/vm/min_free_kbytes
I have not seen any similar errors
< - ixgb.txt in kernel network documentation suggests to increase < net.core.netdev_max_backlog to 300000. This did not help.
mercury1:/proc/sys/net/core# cat netdev_* 300 1000 mercury1:/proc/sys/net/core# echo "300000" >netdev_max_backlog
< - I also had to increase net.core.optmem_max, because the default < value was too small for 700 multicast groups.
I'm not running multicast.
As they're all pretty simple to test, it may be worthwhile to give them a shot just to rule things out.
unfortunantly the load is not high enough right now to see a real difference (it's only doing ~1400 logs/sec) I'll catch it at a higher load point to see if these make any difference. David Lang
Ray