Re: [PATCH] make _minimum_ TCP retransmission timeout configurable take 2
From: Rick Jones <hidden>
Date: 2007-08-31 01:07:31
David Miller wrote:
From: Rick Jones <redacted> Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2007 17:09:04 -0700 (PDT)quoted
Enable configuration of the minimum TCP Retransmission Timeout via a new sysctl "tcp_rto_min" to help those who's networks (eg cellular) have quite variable RTTs avoid spurrious RTOs. Signed-off-by: Rick Jones <redacted> Signed-off-by: Lamont Jones <redacted>Thanks for doing this work Rick. But as John Heffner and I both mentioned, it's pretty clear we should do this as a routing metric. Both for handling realistic scenerios where the sysctl doesn't work, and to help prevent misuse (example: someone decides that it would be _totally_ _awesome_ for "Carrier Grade Linux" to set this to 3 seconds by default in /etc/sysctl.conf and crap like that).
If nothing else it was worth the practice :) I'll be happy with either mechanism, just wasn't sure if the jury was still out on whether making it a routing metric was really necessary. I can see where it would be goodness if one had separate paths out of a system, one with the highly variable RTT and one with non-trivial loss rates, just that thusfar I've not come across any :) I've only seen one path with high RTT variability and the other path with trivial loss rates. Also, not surprisingly, the folks for whom I'm doing this are a triffle "anxious" so I figured that simplicity was worthwhile. Particularly if it was going to be the case those folks were going to be asking for back-ports. Anyhow, I'll try grubbing around the source code (already doing that to see about writing a pet tcp cong module) but if pointers to the likely relevant files were available I could try to help thrash-out the routing metric version. Like I said the consumers of this are a triffle well, "anxious" :) rick