Re: [PATCH] SCTP: drop SACK if ctsn is not less than the next tsn of assoc

(off-list ancestor, not in this archive)
[PATCH] SCTP: drop SACK if ctsn is not less than the next tsn of assoc · Wei Yongjun <hidden> · 2007-07-31
Re: [Lksctp-developers] [PATCH] SCTP: drop SACK if ctsn is not less than the next tsn of assoc · Neil Horman <nhorman@tuxdriver.com> · 2007-07-31
Re: [Lksctp-developers] [PATCH] SCTP: drop SACK if ctsn is not less than the next tsn of assoc · Sridhar Samudrala <hidden> · 2007-07-31
Re: [PATCH] SCTP: drop SACK if ctsn is not less than the next tsn of assoc · Wei Yongjun <hidden> · 2007-08-01
Re: [Lksctp-developers] [PATCH] SCTP: drop SACK if ctsn is not less than the next tsn of assoc · Vlad Yasevich <hidden> · 2007-08-01
Re: [PATCH] SCTP: drop SACK if ctsn is not less than the next tsn of assoc · Wei Yongjun <hidden> · 2007-08-01
Re: [Lksctp-developers] [PATCH] SCTP: drop SACK if ctsn is not less than the next tsn of assoc · Vlad Yasevich <hidden> · 2007-08-01
Re: [PATCH] SCTP: drop SACK if ctsn is not less than the next tsn of assoc · Wei Yongjun <hidden> · 2007-08-02
Re: [PATCH] SCTP: drop SACK if ctsn is not less than the next tsn of assoc · Vlad Yasevich <hidden> · 2007-08-02
Re: [Lksctp-developers] [PATCH] SCTP: drop SACK if ctsn is not less than the next tsn of assoc · Michael Tuexen <hidden> · 2007-08-01
Re: [Lksctp-developers] [PATCH] SCTP: drop SACK if ctsn is not less than the next tsn of assoc · Neil Horman <nhorman@tuxdriver.com> · 2007-08-01

From: Vlad Yasevich <hidden>
Date: 2007-08-02 14:40:57

Wei Yongjun wrote:

Patch has been modified base on comment.
Thanks.

Signed-off-by: Wei Yongjun <redacted>

Ok, I've applied this patch, but in the future, please
generate patches so that they can be applied
with a -p1 flag.

Please see Documentation/SubmittingPatches for proper
format.

Thanks
-vlad

`h`	back out one level
`j`	next message in thread
`k`	previous message in thread
`l`	drill in
`Esc`	close help / fold thread tree
`?`	toggle this help