Thread (3 messages) flat view 3 messages, 2 authors, 2007-07-12

Re: [RFC 1/3] lro: Generic LRO for TCP traffic

From: Evgeniy Polyakov <hidden>
Date: 2007-07-12 09:59:20
Also in: linuxppc-dev, lkml

Hi, Jan-Bernd.

I have couple of comments over implementation besides one you saw
previous time.

On Wed, Jul 11, 2007 at 04:21:34PM +0200, Jan-Bernd Themann (ossthema@de.ibm.com) wrote:
+static int lro_tcp_ip_check(struct sk_buff *skb, struct iphdr *iph,
+			    struct tcphdr *tcph, struct net_lro_desc *lro_desc)
+{
+        /* check ip header: packet length */
+        if (ntohs(iph->tot_len) > skb->len)
+		return -1;
+
+	if (TCP_PAYLOAD_LENGTH(iph, tcph) == 0)
+		return -1;
+
+	if (iph->ihl != IPH_LEN_WO_OPTIONS)
+		return -1;
+
+	if (tcph->cwr || tcph->ece || tcph->urg || !tcph->ack || tcph->psh
+	    || tcph->rst || tcph->syn || tcph->fin)
+		return -1;
I think you do not want to break lro frame because of push flag - it is
pretty common flag, which does not brak processing (and I'm not sure if
it has any special meaning this days).
+	if (INET_ECN_is_ce(ipv4_get_dsfield(iph)))
+		return -1;
+
+	if (tcph->doff != TCPH_LEN_WO_OPTIONS
+	    && tcph->doff != TCPH_LEN_W_TIMESTAMP)
+		return -1;
+
+	/* check tcp options (only timestamp allowed) */
+	if (tcph->doff == TCPH_LEN_W_TIMESTAMP) {
+		u32 *topt = (u32 *)(tcph + 1);
+
+		if (*topt != htonl((TCPOPT_NOP << 24) | (TCPOPT_NOP << 16)
+				   | (TCPOPT_TIMESTAMP << 8)
+				   | TCPOLEN_TIMESTAMP))
+			return -1;
+
+		/* timestamp should be in right order */
+		topt++;
+		if (lro_desc && (ntohl(lro_desc->tcp_rcv_tsval) > ntohl(*topt)))
+			return -1;
This still does not handle wrapping over 32 bits.
What about
if (lro_desc && after(ntohl(lro_desc->tcp_rcv_tsval), ntohl(*topt)))
	return -1;
+		/* timestamp reply should not be zero */
+		topt++;
+		if (*topt == 0)
+			return -1;
+	}
+
+	return 0;
+}
+static struct net_lro_desc *lro_get_desc(struct net_lro_mgr *mgr,
+					 struct net_lro_desc *lro_arr,
+					 struct iphdr *iph,
+					 struct tcphdr *tcph)
+{
+	struct net_lro_desc *lro_desc = NULL;
+	struct net_lro_desc *tmp;
+	int max_desc = mgr->max_desc;
+	int i;
+
+	for (i = 0; i < max_desc; i++) {
+		tmp = &lro_arr[i];
+		if (tmp->active)
+			if (!lro_check_tcp_conn(tmp, iph, tcph)) {
+				lro_desc = tmp;
+				goto out;
+			}
+	}
Ugh... What about tree structure or hash here?
+	for (i = 0; i < max_desc; i++) {
+		if(!lro_arr[i].active) {
+			lro_desc = &lro_arr[i];
+			goto out;
+		}
+	}
+
+out:
+	return lro_desc;
+}
+int __lro_proc_skb(struct net_lro_mgr *lro_mgr, struct sk_buff *skb,
+		   struct vlan_group *vgrp, u16 vlan_tag, void *priv)
+{
+	struct net_lro_desc *lro_desc;
+        struct iphdr *iph;
+        struct tcphdr *tcph;
+
+	if (!lro_mgr->get_ip_tcp_hdr
+	    || lro_mgr->get_ip_tcp_hdr(skb, &iph, &tcph, priv))
+		goto out;
+
+	lro_desc = lro_get_desc(lro_mgr, lro_mgr->lro_arr, iph, tcph);
+	if (!lro_desc)
+		goto out;
There is no protection of the descriptor array from accessing from
different CPUs. Is it forbidden to share net_lro_mgr structure?

-- 
	Evgeniy Polyakov
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help