Re: [RFC 1/3] lro: Generic LRO for TCP traffic
From: Evgeniy Polyakov <hidden>
Date: 2007-07-12 09:59:20
Also in:
linuxppc-dev, lkml
Hi, Jan-Bernd. I have couple of comments over implementation besides one you saw previous time. On Wed, Jul 11, 2007 at 04:21:34PM +0200, Jan-Bernd Themann (ossthema@de.ibm.com) wrote:
+static int lro_tcp_ip_check(struct sk_buff *skb, struct iphdr *iph,
+ struct tcphdr *tcph, struct net_lro_desc *lro_desc)
+{
+ /* check ip header: packet length */
+ if (ntohs(iph->tot_len) > skb->len)
+ return -1;
+
+ if (TCP_PAYLOAD_LENGTH(iph, tcph) == 0)
+ return -1;
+
+ if (iph->ihl != IPH_LEN_WO_OPTIONS)
+ return -1;
+
+ if (tcph->cwr || tcph->ece || tcph->urg || !tcph->ack || tcph->psh
+ || tcph->rst || tcph->syn || tcph->fin)
+ return -1;I think you do not want to break lro frame because of push flag - it is pretty common flag, which does not brak processing (and I'm not sure if it has any special meaning this days).
+ if (INET_ECN_is_ce(ipv4_get_dsfield(iph)))
+ return -1;
+
+ if (tcph->doff != TCPH_LEN_WO_OPTIONS
+ && tcph->doff != TCPH_LEN_W_TIMESTAMP)
+ return -1;
+
+ /* check tcp options (only timestamp allowed) */
+ if (tcph->doff == TCPH_LEN_W_TIMESTAMP) {
+ u32 *topt = (u32 *)(tcph + 1);
+
+ if (*topt != htonl((TCPOPT_NOP << 24) | (TCPOPT_NOP << 16)
+ | (TCPOPT_TIMESTAMP << 8)
+ | TCPOLEN_TIMESTAMP))
+ return -1;
+
+ /* timestamp should be in right order */
+ topt++;
+ if (lro_desc && (ntohl(lro_desc->tcp_rcv_tsval) > ntohl(*topt)))
+ return -1;This still does not handle wrapping over 32 bits. What about if (lro_desc && after(ntohl(lro_desc->tcp_rcv_tsval), ntohl(*topt))) return -1;
+ /* timestamp reply should not be zero */ + topt++; + if (*topt == 0) + return -1; + } + + return 0; +}
+static struct net_lro_desc *lro_get_desc(struct net_lro_mgr *mgr,
+ struct net_lro_desc *lro_arr,
+ struct iphdr *iph,
+ struct tcphdr *tcph)
+{
+ struct net_lro_desc *lro_desc = NULL;
+ struct net_lro_desc *tmp;
+ int max_desc = mgr->max_desc;
+ int i;
+
+ for (i = 0; i < max_desc; i++) {
+ tmp = &lro_arr[i];
+ if (tmp->active)
+ if (!lro_check_tcp_conn(tmp, iph, tcph)) {
+ lro_desc = tmp;
+ goto out;
+ }
+ }Ugh... What about tree structure or hash here?
+ for (i = 0; i < max_desc; i++) {
+ if(!lro_arr[i].active) {
+ lro_desc = &lro_arr[i];
+ goto out;
+ }
+ }
+
+out:
+ return lro_desc;
+}+int __lro_proc_skb(struct net_lro_mgr *lro_mgr, struct sk_buff *skb,
+ struct vlan_group *vgrp, u16 vlan_tag, void *priv)
+{
+ struct net_lro_desc *lro_desc;
+ struct iphdr *iph;
+ struct tcphdr *tcph;
+
+ if (!lro_mgr->get_ip_tcp_hdr
+ || lro_mgr->get_ip_tcp_hdr(skb, &iph, &tcph, priv))
+ goto out;
+
+ lro_desc = lro_get_desc(lro_mgr, lro_mgr->lro_arr, iph, tcph);
+ if (!lro_desc)
+ goto out;There is no protection of the descriptor array from accessing from different CPUs. Is it forbidden to share net_lro_mgr structure? -- Evgeniy Polyakov