Re: Proposed interface for per-packet mesh-ttl

(off-list ancestor, not in this archive)
Proposed interface for per-packet mesh-ttl · Javier Cardona <hidden> · 2007-07-03
Re: Proposed interface for per-packet mesh-ttl · Dan Williams <hidden> · 2007-07-25
Re: Proposed interface for per-packet mesh-ttl · Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org> · 2007-07-27
Re: Proposed interface for per-packet mesh-ttl · Dan Williams <hidden> · 2007-07-27
Re: Proposed interface for per-packet mesh-ttl · Stephen Hemminger <hidden> · 2007-07-28
Re: Proposed interface for per-packet mesh-ttl · Javier Cardona <hidden> · 2007-07-30
Re: Proposed interface for per-packet mesh-ttl · Stephen Hemminger <hidden> · 2007-07-30
Re: Proposed interface for per-packet mesh-ttl · Luis Carlos Cobo <hidden> · 2007-08-16
Re: Proposed interface for per-packet mesh-ttl · Stephen Hemminger <hidden> · 2007-08-16
Re: Proposed interface for per-packet mesh-ttl · Luis Carlos Cobo <hidden> · 2007-08-16

From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Date: 2007-07-27 19:56:17

On Tue, Jul 03, 2007 at 12:29:24PM -0700, Javier Cardona wrote:

I'm currently working on per-packet mesh ttl.  My plan is to register
new mesh sockopts through netfilter.  The user interface will be:

NACK.  Drivers should never add sockopt, and drivers should not abuse
netfilter hooks.