On Wed, 18 Jul 2007 11:14:40 -0500, Larry Finger wrote:
quoted
- local->tx_headroom = max(local->hw.extra_tx_headroom,
- sizeof(struct ieee80211_tx_status_rtap_hdr));
+ local->tx_headroom = max_t(unsigned, local->hw.extra_tx_headroom,
+ sizeof(struct ieee80211_tx_status_rtap_hdr));
debugfs_hw_add(local);
For my info on how to use max_t, not as a critique of this patch.
(1) Is 'unsigned' enough or should it be 'unsigned int'?
Don't know. For a C compiler, it doesn't matter, but it's fact that
most of the code in the kernel uses "unsigned int".
(2) Because tx_headroom is an int, why use unsigned at all?
Because hw.extra_tx_headroom is unsigned. tx_headroom should be IMO
unsigned too but that's not just a matter of changing its type as it
would mean a lot of new warnings. We're talking about numbers several
orders less than int, so it's not an issue here anyway.
If you think "int" is more appropriate, fine with me, I don't really
care.
Jiri
--
Jiri Benc
SUSE Labs