Re: [PATCH 2.6.21.3] ppp_mppe: account for osize too small errors in mppe_decompress()
From: Konstantin <hidden>
Date: 2007-06-19 21:33:22
Also in:
lkml
Thanks for pointing this out. It seems that we would need to allocate this extra byte somewhere in kernel ppp code. However, I am not very familiar with that part of the code yet, and I'll appreciate any help with finding parts of code where obuffer for mppe_decompress is allocated. On 6/20/07, Sergey Vlasov [off-list ref] wrote:
On Tue, 05 Jun 2007 22:23:02 +1100 Konstantin Sharlaimov wrote:quoted
Prevent mppe_decompress() from generating "osize too small" errors when checking for output buffer size. When receiving a packet of mru size the output buffer for decrypted data is 1 byte too small since mppe_decompress() tries to account for possible PFC, however later in code it is assumed no PFC. Adjusting the check prevented there errors from occurring. Signed-off-by: Konstantin Sharlaimov <redacted> ------ linux-2.6.21.3/drivers/net/ppp_mppe.c.orig 2007-06-01 20:57:04.000000000 +1100 +++ linux-2.6.21.3/drivers/net/ppp_mppe.c 2007-06-05 21:46:30.000000000 +1100@@ -493,14 +493,14 @@ mppe_decompress(void *arg, unsigned char /* * Make sure we have enough room to decrypt the packet. - * Note that for our test we only subtract 1 byte whereas in - * mppe_compress() we added 2 bytes (+MPPE_OVHD); - * this is to account for possible PFC. + * To account for possible PFC we should only subtract 1 + * byte whereas in mppe_compress() we added 2 bytes (+MPPE_OVHD); + * However, we assume no PFC, thus subtracting 2 bytes. */ - if (osize < isize - MPPE_OVHD - 1) { + if (osize < isize - MPPE_OVHD - 2) { printk(KERN_DEBUG "mppe_decompress[%d]: osize too small! " "(have: %d need: %d)\n", state->unit, - osize, isize - MPPE_OVHD - 1); + osize, isize - MPPE_OVHD - 2); return DECOMP_ERROR; } osize = isize - MPPE_OVHD - 2; /* assume no PFC */Seems that this patch is not correct - even though the comment above says "assume no PFC", the subsequent code actually supports PFC: /* * Do PFC decompression. * This would be nicer if we were given the actual sk_buff * instead of a char *. */ if ((obuf[0] & 0x01) != 0) { obuf[1] = obuf[0]; obuf[0] = 0; obuf++; osize++; } Therefore, depending on the packet contents, the decompressor may really need that extra byte in the output buffer, and changing the check may cause buffer overflows.