Re: [RFD] L2 Network namespace infrastructure

quoted

quoted

quoted

quoted

"DM" == David Miller [off-list ref] writes:

DM> Containers are I believe a step backwards, and we're better than
DM> that.

Are there any alternative proposals?

I guess it would be a start if you could run processes with a
different policy table as default. Ideally traffic from those
processes would automatically enter a particular policy table without
having to manually set up "ip rule" to catch their traffic. ip route
would by default show that policy table; quagga would by default
manage that table.

I think that would provide me with the functionality I need, and it
would not pretend to provide isolation.


/Benny