Thread (10 messages) 10 messages, 6 authors, 2007-06-27

RE: Definition and usage of NETIF_F_HW_SUM?

From: Ron Mercer <hidden>
Date: 2007-06-04 15:35:45

I was out of town last week and did not have a chance to respond.  Yes,
qla3xxx is (before Stephen's fix) broken on IPV6.  I will review the
changes and post a patch if necessary. 
-----Original Message-----
From: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org 
[mailto:netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org] On Behalf Of Stephen Hemminger
Sent: Tuesday, May 29, 2007 4:46 PM
To: Michael Chan
Cc: Herbert Xu; netdev
Subject: Re: Definition and usage of NETIF_F_HW_SUM?

On Tue, 29 May 2007 17:10:52 -0700
"Michael Chan" [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
On Wed, 2007-05-30 at 07:36 +1000, Herbert Xu wrote:
quoted
I just checked e1000 and it's correct as it does use the 
csum_offset
quoted
quoted
when doing TX offload.  However, you're definitely right that bnx2
seems to be broken.
quoted
A few devices take a offset, starting point, and 
insertion point. This looks like
quoted
quoted
quoted
the correct model. But no upper layer protocols other 
than IPV4/IPV6 can do checksum
quoted
quoted
quoted
offload at present, so it seems moot.
I could easily whip up a patch to get GRE to use it for a start :)
quoted
IMHO the correct solution would be to get rid if 
NETIF_F_HW_SUM and make a new flag
quoted
quoted
quoted
NETIF_F_IPV6_SUM. Devices that can checksum both could 
do NETIF_F_IPV4_SUM|NETI_F_IPV6_SUM.
quoted
quoted
We should definitely keep NETIF_F_HW_SUM for sane 
hardware such as the
quoted
quoted
e1000.  Unfortunately we may just have to invent IPV6_SUM 
for the broken
quoted
quoted
ones.

Ccing Michael to see if the bnx2 chip can actually do offset-based
checksum offload.
bnx2 and tg3 cannot do offset-based checksumming because 
the hardware
quoted
doesn't have room in the buffer descriptors to specify the 
offsets.  So
quoted
regrettably, the NETIF_F_HW_SUM flag has been misused in 
these drivers.
quoted
A new NETIF_F_IPV6_SUM flag will be very useful for us.
Look furthur many drivers are just plain broken and use F_HW_SUM
and can't even do IPV6 properly.  I'll fix

The worst code award goes to: qla3xxx.c
which is broken on IPV6 and goes to trouble of computing all the
offsets and they are already there in skb...



-- 
Stephen Hemminger [off-list ref]
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help