Thread (5 messages) 5 messages, 2 authors, 2007-06-01

Re: Fix "ipOutNoRoutes" counter error for TCP and UDP

From: weidong <hidden>
Date: 2007-06-01 05:39:43

Mr David

    Sorry to trouble many times, I will attention to this next time.

    I have made this patch again, and I tried, it can be patched to the recently
    kernel of linux-2.6.21.3. following is the patch, and I also attach this
    patch to the attachment.

    Signed-off-by: Wei Dong [off-list ref]

diff -Nurp a/net/ipv4/datagram.c b/net/ipv4/datagram.c
--- a/net/ipv4/datagram.c       2007-06-01 13:22:39.000000000 +0800
+++ b/net/ipv4/datagram.c       2007-06-01 13:24:21.000000000 +0800
@@ -50,8 +50,12 @@ int ip4_datagram_connect(struct sock *sk
                                RT_CONN_FLAGS(sk), oif,
                                sk->sk_protocol,
                                inet->sport, usin->sin_port, sk, 1);
-       if (err)
+       if (err) {
+               if (err == -ENETUNREACH)
+                       IP_INC_STATS_BH(IPSTATS_MIB_OUTNOROUTES);
                 return err;
+       }
+
         if ((rt->rt_flags & RTCF_BROADCAST) && !sock_flag(sk, SOCK_BROADCAST)) {
                 ip_rt_put(rt);
                 return -EACCES;
diff -Nurp a/net/ipv4/tcp_ipv4.c b/net/ipv4/tcp_ipv4.c
--- a/net/ipv4/tcp_ipv4.c       2007-06-01 13:22:39.000000000 +0800
+++ b/net/ipv4/tcp_ipv4.c       2007-06-01 13:25:07.000000000 +0800
@@ -192,8 +192,11 @@ int tcp_v4_connect(struct sock *sk, stru
                                RT_CONN_FLAGS(sk), sk->sk_bound_dev_if,
                                IPPROTO_TCP,
                                inet->sport, usin->sin_port, sk, 1);
-       if (tmp < 0)
+       if (tmp < 0) {
+               if (tmp == -ENETUNREACH)
+                       IP_INC_STATS_BH(IPSTATS_MIB_OUTNOROUTES);
                 return tmp;
+       }

         if (rt->rt_flags & (RTCF_MULTICAST | RTCF_BROADCAST)) {
                 ip_rt_put(rt);
diff -Nurp a/net/ipv4/udp.c b/net/ipv4/udp.c
--- a/net/ipv4/udp.c    2007-06-01 13:22:39.000000000 +0800
+++ b/net/ipv4/udp.c    2007-06-01 13:26:47.000000000 +0800
@@ -631,8 +631,11 @@ int udp_sendmsg(struct kiocb *iocb, stru
                                                  .dport = dport } } };
                 security_sk_classify_flow(sk, &fl);
                 err = ip_route_output_flow(&rt, &fl, sk, 1);
-               if (err)
+               if (err) {
+                       if (err == -ENETUNREACH)
+                               IP_INC_STATS_BH(IPSTATS_MIB_OUTNOROUTES);
                         goto out;
+               }

                 err = -EACCES;
                 if ((rt->rt_flags & RTCF_BROADCAST) &&


David Miller wrote:
From: Wei Dong <redacted>
Date: Thu, 31 May 2007 09:16:50 +0800
quoted
Hi Mr. David
  I have modified my patch according to you advice. I think -
EHOSTUNREACH is only for "input path". In "output" path, we can just
simply check-ENETUNREACH  (^_^), the patch is shown in the end of this mail.

 I send this patch to you several weeks ago, but you have not replied to me.
This patch is not correctly?
Your email client is still corrupting the patch, it changes
tab characters into spaces.  This makes the patch not apply.

Please do not send the same unusable patch so many times.
Instead, I recommend to email the patch to yourself, and
you try to apply it, in the same way someone else receiving
your patch posting would.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Attachments

Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help