Re: Strange soft lockup detected message (looks like spin_lock bug in pcnet32)

On Fri, May 04, 2007 at 10:10:24AM -0400, Lennart Sorensen wrote:

On Thu, May 03, 2007 at 04:31:43PM -0400, Lennart Sorensen wrote:

[...]

Should line 2563 be a spin_lock_irqsave instead along with the
appropriate unluck later?

IIRC, when you enable lockdep, it will complain about spinlocks used in
an invalid context.

Regards,
Frederik

--
Len Sorensen
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/