Thread (24 messages) 24 messages, 5 authors, 2007-06-04

Re: [patch 5/7] CAN: Add virtual CAN netdevice driver

From: Patrick McHardy <hidden>
Date: 2007-05-30 19:58:19

Oliver Hartkopp wrote:
Patrick McHardy wrote:
quoted
skb->sk should work here as well since you detect these frames
before queueing to the receiving socket.
 

Hm - this would indeed be much nicer than using skb->cb.

I think we just had some concerns to use skb->sk for our own
functionality, as it might be used and dereferenced by other layers
between the socket and the network driver ... so setting skb->sk to NULL
(to indicate 'no loopback') smells bad if you don't really know who ever
dereferences skb->sk.

Indeed, that will break things.
Btw. it's really worth to look at it again. I just had the idea to
access the loopback flag via skb->sk->opt->loopback (argpfl!) on the TX
path and skb->sk on the RX path. This would avoid skb->sk to be set to
NULL but need to have this loopback flag to be implemented in each CAN
socket opt.

Yes, thats what I wanted to suggest. You should even be able
to use skb->sk->opt->loopback on the receive path before you
queue the packet to the socket.
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help